Blah blah blah? Are you trying to improve on your argument? It is good to see you try but blah blah blah is no more a rational argument than its legal its legal. Repeating that its legal does not represent a rational argument in support of your postion. Slavery was legal also and it took more than 35 years to overturn that institution. Your lack of any historical knowledge or context leaves you at a distinct disadvantage in this. But that is good. I will enjoy your outrage all the more because you didn't see it coming.
Everyone? Tell me, do you accept the fact that an unborn at any stage of development is a living human being knowing that in the eyes of the law, all human beings are persons? More logical fallacy topgun. It is all you have.
Reality is that you are in a very small and shrinking minority.
The legal definition of person is "a human being" That is not a matter of opinion. It is that definition that forced the roe majority to make their incorrect and baseless assumption. That is reality. Unborns are human beings. That is reality. Human beings have the right to live. That is reality. One individuals wants don't take precedence over another's right to live. That is reality. Neither you, nor any pro choicer can offer up a rational defense of your position. That is reality. You are in a small and shirinking minority. That is reality. I guess from your perspective, reality bites.
Sorry, but it is wishful thinking. It is a logical fallacy. It is an appeal to common practice and rationally indefensible. It is an appeal to popularity and rationally indefensible. It is an appeal to fear and rationally indefensible. It is a red herring and rationally indefensible.
You say lots of things. You prove nothing. Your uneducated opinion is not impressive. If you are in tune with reality, then you know that a minority as small as you belong to will never be able to pass such an amendment.
The number of times I personally have had to correct you on very basic issues from biology, to the law, to the constituion itself draws a very large question mark over that statement and calls into question everything that follows.
Refer to your constitution. Refer to article 1 section 8 and get in touch with reality.
So are you still trying to argue that two wrongs make a right?
Sorry, but I am not interpreting. Had they meant that we were born with certain rights, they would have said it. In fact, when the 14th amendment was written some years after they did say that we were born with certain rights, but fundamental rights were not among them. Face it topgun, you don't know enough about the law or constitution to argue from that point. You get smeared every time.
Perhaps you should do a bit of research into those "pro choice" seats. The bulk of those favor restricting abortion as well. Not that it matters because in the end, the issue won't be decided by congress. You know as well as I that abortion on demand legislation wouldn't even get through the state house in the most liberal state in the union.
