Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
Because the first is based on logic and known Human response. We know that the vast vasy majority of people have in internal response to try to live, and we know that anyone who is rational knows if the USSR tried to nuke the US we would nuked them, and we would both all be dead. We know that a logical rational person would not wish to have there whole nation killed in order to just attack someone else. it is the reason why Al Qaeda with nukes, does is more scary, because they do not fit the MAD profile as it applies to a rational nation. And do you disagree with the logic that a nation would have no will to see itself destroyed?Now the Idea Bush's policy is why there was no attack since Sept 11.What is that based on outside the fact that there was no attack? Also as stated there was no attack before Sept 11 , for a great deal of time, so it is not logical to say that the reason that there was no attack after from teh same group was his policy. No one making this claim can show any single act that was stopped due to his policy. you cant show that there is any logical reason to show that his actions stopped anything. with the same logic of no attack, we can say that Clinton's policy was then just as effective as there was no attack on US soil for years after . Its clear CLinton's was not.Now if you want to point out somthing other then the simple fact nothing has happened in the US since, as evidence thats fine. Just like I could I am sure show you evidence that most people dont want to have there nation whiped off the face of the earth...But I think I dont need to becuse I am guessing you would agree.
Because the first is based on logic and known Human response. We know that the vast vasy majority of people have in internal response to try to live, and we know that anyone who is rational knows if the USSR tried to nuke the US we would nuked them, and we would both all be dead. We know that a logical rational person would not wish to have there whole nation killed in order to just attack someone else. it is the reason why Al Qaeda with nukes, does is more scary, because they do not fit the MAD profile as it applies to a rational nation. And do you disagree with the logic that a nation would have no will to see itself destroyed?
Now the Idea Bush's policy is why there was no attack since Sept 11.
What is that based on outside the fact that there was no attack? Also as stated there was no attack before Sept 11 , for a great deal of time, so it is not logical to say that the reason that there was no attack after from teh same group was his policy. No one making this claim can show any single act that was stopped due to his policy. you cant show that there is any logical reason to show that his actions stopped anything. with the same logic of no attack, we can say that Clinton's policy was then just as effective as there was no attack on US soil for years after . Its clear CLinton's was not.
Now if you want to point out somthing other then the simple fact nothing has happened in the US since, as evidence thats fine. Just like I could I am sure show you evidence that most people dont want to have there nation whiped off the face of the earth...But I think I dont need to becuse I am guessing you would agree.
