Reply to thread

Of course. He would have all of those once the pregnancy comes to term and a child is born.  But before that it is only her body that is in question. And either she has control over her body or not.  Why don’t you be “man enough,” and outright say she does not have control over her body while she is pregnant?


But you did not spell out exactly what right.  For example, should the man be able to veto the woman even when she has a legal right to terminate her pregnancy? Be”man enough” and say it rather than continuing to insinuate it. 


And what if we both the woman and the man want to terminate the pregnancy? (I know I know your head just exploded hearing that question. Now do your best to avoid answering it.)



fair enough. Give us a number.  And you want a woman be able to murder her baby just because she cannot afford it?  This is how your right wing extremist comrades sound like. 


I am willing to go with this. But would you agree 6 weeks which is before the overwhelming majority of women even know they are pregnant is an insincere and cruel policy?


Back
Top