Care to bring some "religious" argument forward? That is a tidy dodge that a lot on the pro choice side use. You claim that the pro life argument is religious in nature but oddly enough, find it very difficult, if not impossible to bring religious arguments from pro lifers up as evidence.
Considering that 45 million have been killed since roe, to assume that women don't take abortion lightly would be a mistake. Most abortions are nothing more than a means of birth control.
You are nothing more than a few more cells doing what they are programmed to do. You do not make a conscious effort to live. You don't make a conscious effort to exchange oxygen for CO2 in your lungs, you don't make a conscious effort to absorb nutrients in your gut, you make no conscious effort to live at all.
That you can't wrap your mind around the idea that an immature human being is just as human as you doesn't change the fact in the slightest that they are.
Once again, if you believe my argument is religious in nature, bring it here as evidence. Otherwise defend your position rather than casting false aspersions on mine.
As to religion causing suffering, consider that 45 million human beings have been denied their most basic human right in this country alone since 1972. When you can point to any religion being responsible for a human rights disaster of that magnitude in that amount of time in this country, then you will be justified in pointing at religion.
