Reply to thread

Actually there is.  It is the same argument that confers the right to life to you.  Now, if you can prove that unborns are not exactly as human as you, then you can effectively separate them from you and prove that they have no right to live.  Simply saying "brainless cells" does not make an argument.  It is like saying that until you have permanant teeth you have no right to live.  Human beings exist before they have permanant teeth and they exist before they develop brains.


Consider children born with ancephaly.  They have no brain.  They will never have a thought, a feeling, feel pain, or be aware of their surroundings, but they are considered by the law to be human beings.  They can not be summarily killed.  Your brain is not what makes you a human being.  I do invite you to try to prove that it is rather than simply repeat your non arguments ad nauseum as if the repeating constituted some sort of argument.


So far, you have failed to prove even the smallest part of your argument.  By the way, I do enjoy the name calling on your part.  It highlights your indimidation.  You are trying to prove your bravery by impotent name calling.  Look around a bit.  People who are confident in their ability to defend their positions rarely, if ever, change peoples screen names.  We are not intimidated.  Those who routinely go about changing others screen names are most often the very ones who couldn't argue thier way out of a paper bag.


As to suggesting that I am a hypocrit.  To date, you have not proved that either.  You claimed that I said some things, but are completely unable to bring quotes from me forward.  That would be because in addition to being a poor debater, you are a liar.


Back
Top