Odd that you would now seek refuge in science. There is no hiding place for the likes of you in science. You have proven yourself to be a flat earther who disregards science in favor of his own pseudoreligious dogma.
"the proposition that an unborn child is a human being from conception is “supported by standard textbooks on embryology or human biology"T.W. SADLER, LANGMAN’S MEDICAL EMBRYOLOGY (John N. Gardner ed., 6th ed.)
"Fertilization is an important landmark because, under ordinary circumstances, a new, genetically distinct human being is thereby formed... The zygote is a unicellular human being... Ronan R. O'Rahilly, Fabiola Muller, (New York: Wiley-Liss), 5, 55. EMBRYOLOGY & TERATOLOGY
"Every time a sperm cell and ovum unite a new human being is created which is alive and will continue to live unless its death is brought about by some specific condition."E.L. Potter and J.M. Craig, PATHOLOGY OF THE FETUS AND THE INFANT, 3d ed. (Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, vii.
These are just a few although practically every textbook on the subjects of embryology, fetology, human developmental biology, and OB/gyn say the same thing. LANGMAN’S MEDICAL EMBRYOLOGY, EMBRYOLOGY & TERATOLOGY, PATHOLOGY OF THE FETUS AND THE INFANT, these are science dawkins. Not soft science, but hard science; advanced degree hard.
You suggest that someone "try science" beause "it is much better than superstition". I would like to see some of the science you suggest he try. I would like to see any credible science at all that supports your argument. The fact is that your entire argument is nothing more than an expression of superstitious dogma. You are unable to wrap your mind around the scientific facts so you glom on to a meaningless soundbite like 'brainless cells' and wave it around like a religious icon.
Lets see your science dawkins.
