"stuff"? Hard and credible science that proves you wrong is "stuff"? I laugh in your face.
It explains why unborns are exactly as human as you. As to whether it is right or wrong to kill them, you would have to ask whether it is right or wrong to kill anyone; the law says that self defense is the only valid reason for one human bing to kill another.
By the way einstein. A fetus is not brainless. By the time the child may be correctly called a fetus, it has a brain. I understand that you are completely ignorant on the topic of human developmental biology, but it isn't rocket science and even someone like you should be able to at least learn the basics.
I have. Sorry you are unable to wrap your mind around it. Funny that someone of your obviously limited intellectual wattage would present intelligence as a requisite to be a human being.
Arent you just the very shining definition of a hypocrite? Asking that we avoid "emotive" language when you son't seem to be able to finish a thought without saying "brainless cells". Do show me such a term in either a scientific text or a legal brief. Both science and the law identify them as children. Do provide some substantiation for your request.
Reference to war in a discussion on the topic of abortion, is, as I have already explained to you, a logical fallacy. It is a red herring and in no way alters the facts as they apply to abortion. I understand that concepts like logical fallacy must be difficult for you to grasp, but do be a good lad and try.
