Americans are going to blame big oil and Zionism for getting them into this mess.

marcellus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
274
http://www.rense.com/general34/resent.htm

Changes are on the way.Americans are getting tired of wars.
The number of Americans who keep responsible the big oil
and the zionists for the impasse in Iraq is growing dayly.
When things go sour ,people look for the responsibles.
Aipac that calls for wars should be closed as a foreigh
entity in Usa.


http://www.rense.com/general34/resent.htm
By Henry Makow, Ph.D.
2-10-3

Last week, The Boston Globe "outed" Sen. John Kerry's Jewish ancestry.

The newspaper hired an Austrian genealogist who established that Kerry's grandparents were Jewish and changed their name from "Kohn" to "Kerry" in 1902.

Sen. Kerry, a practising Catholic, was amazed. "This is incredible stuff," he said. "I think it is more than interesting; it is a revelation." http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe
2/033/nation/Search_for_Kerry_s_roots_fins_surprising_
history_is_probably_best+.shtml

A leading contender for the 2004 Presidential nomination, Kerry is often referred to in his home state of Massachusetts as an "Irish American". He said he always tried to correct this impression.

Meanwhile the news didn't alarm another leading Democratic contender, Sen. Joseph Lieberman. According to his assistant, Lieberman who is an Orthodox Jew is the only candidate with "a real lox box."

By the time November 2004 rolls around, being Jewish may or may not be an asset. If the Iraq war goes smoothly and the Muslim world graciously submits to U.S. hegemony, it may be an benefit.

But if the U.S. gets bogged down with heavy casualties on both sides, Americans are going to blame big oil and Zionism for getting them into this mess.

Everybody knows that:

1) The only country that fears Iraq's WMD's is Israel;

2) American-Jewish neo-conservatives on the Defence Policy Board (Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz) planned this war in 1998 and made it Bush Administration policy;

3) The purpose of the war is to change the balance of power in the Middle East so Israel can settle the Palestinian issue on its own terms; and

4) Congress trembles in fear before the Israeli Lobby, "AIPAC."

Whatever the real significance of John Kerry's "outing," the symbolism is clear. At this perilous juncture in US history, there is no effective opposition because Zionist Jews appear to control both parties.

The Jewish "Anti Defamation League" considers it a barometer of anti Semitism to say, "Jews have too much power." But is something anti Semitic if it is true? Anti Semitism is racial prejudice. Zionist power is not a racial prejudice; it is a fact of life. When a special interest group hijacks American foreign policy, it is a patriotic duty to say so.

Stalin banned "anti Semitism" on pain of death. Does Stalin control the USA?

Zionists believe Jews must have a national homeland in Israel. But Israel was not established for the well being of the Jewish people. The British elite planted Jews in the Arab world to help colonize it. This is the way Zionists actually saw themselves. (See Chaim Weizmann's Trial and Error.)

The elite's hidden agenda was to produce the conditions for a possible Third World War leading to "world government." This may be unfolding now.

Zionists leaders belong to a small interlocking network of people who think they have a divine right to rule the world. This includes members of the British and European aristocracy, and the many multinational corporations related to the Rockefeller and Rothschild cartels.

In recent decades, Zionists have succeeded in making support for Zionism synonymous with "Jewish." They have made Israel appear to be a vulnerable country facing annihilation in a sea of bloodthirsty Arabs.

continuation:
http://www.rense.com/general34/resent.htm
 
Werbung:
marcellus, et al,

There is some truth to this; but drawing the wrong conclusion.

Changes are on the way. Americans are getting tired of wars. The number of Americans who keep responsible the big oil and the zionists for the impasse in Iraq is growing dayly. When things go sour ,people look for the responsibles. Aipac that calls for wars should be closed as a foreigh entity in Usa.
(COMMENT)

Of course the US and its citizens are growing tired of wars. That much is probably true. But I doubt that they (the US Citizens) will blame Israel for its troubles or the outcome in Iraq.

This is not to say that an ever growing number of Americans are coming to recognize that Israel is not a true ally (Remember the USS Liberty). Israel will act in their own best interest, even if that means hurting the United States.

Last week, The Boston Globe "outed" Sen. John Kerry's Jewish ancestry.
(COMMENT)

Irrelevant. While this might have some importants to non-Americans, in the context of a "true American," ancestry is of little to no importance. It is about who you are and what you do. Deeds are what is important.

Everybody knows that:

1) The only country that fears Iraq's WMD's is Israel;

2) American-Jewish neo-conservatives on the Defence Policy Board (Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz) planned this war in 1998 and made it Bush Administration policy;

3) The purpose of the war is to change the balance of power in the Middle East so Israel can settle the Palestinian issue on its own terms; and

4) Congress trembles in fear before the Israeli Lobby, "AIPAC."
(COMMENT)

  • WMD presents a threat when in the hands of a rouge government or non-state actors. It is a concern to every major nation.
  • Yes, we know all about the PNAC and the impact that it had on the national security decision making process. But it has no real connection to the Jewish Ancestry of the leadership involved. The leadership was incompetent and extremely arrogant. They tended to dismiss, distort and deny critical elements of information that tended to question the agenda they had. It lead to both unsound and invalid critical thinking. This happens from time to time with key official that believe themselves to be above the capacity of making a mistake. This happened with the "Whiz Kids" in the 1960's and Vietnam.
  • The purpose was to establish a "hegemony" for the US. While it might have made a difference to the settlement between the Palestinians and Israelis, its real intent was to set the base of power for the US.
  • AIPAC is a problem, but there are several lobbies that pose similar problems. AIPAC poses more of a problem to the overall Israeli relationship with the US, in that non-members will begin to gradually turn against it as a threat controlled by a foreign power.

Whatever the real significance of John Kerry's "outing," the symbolism is clear. At this perilous juncture in US history, there is no effective opposition because Zionist Jews appear to control both parties.

The Jewish "Anti Defamation League" considers it a barometer of anti Semitism to say, "Jews have too much power." But is something anti Semitic if it is true? Anti Semitism is racial prejudice. Zionist power is not a racial prejudice; it is a fact of life. When a special interest group hijacks American foreign policy, it is a patriotic duty to say so.
(COMMENT)

This is nonsense (respectfully). Americans simply don't think in these terms. This is just fear mongering.

Eventually, US support to Israel will be irrelevant. The US will no longer be able to afford intervention in the Middle East conflict; either on the pro-Israeli side or the pro-Palestinian side. The US is turning into an economic disaster and will not be able to maintain its military superiority. Without that military superiority, it will no longer be "persuasive in peace - or - invincible in war."

Most Respectfully - An Opposing View,
R
 
NO!! BLAME BUSH!!! Now if People were smart enough to Elect AL GORE in the first place we wouldnt be at war right now! Al Gore would turn the other cheek like Jesus Christ would after 9/11 attacks. Heres what Jesus said about using Violence.

"Put your sword back into its place, for all those who take the sword will die by the sword.


"An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth." But I say to you, Do not resist one who is evil. But if any one strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also; and if any one would sue you and take your coat, let him have your cloak as well; and if any one forces you to go one mile, go with him two miles.


Why couldnt Voters learn this? Al Gore would followed Jesus examples
 
marcellus, et al,

There is some truth to this; but drawing the wrong conclusion.

(COMMENT)

Of course the US and its citizens are growing tired of wars. That much is probably true. But I doubt that they (the US Citizens) will blame Israel for its troubles or the outcome in Iraq.

This is not to say that an ever growing number of Americans are coming to recognize that Israel is not a true ally (Remember the USS Liberty). Israel will act in their own best interest, even if that means hurting the United States.

Salve...You have good points ,my friend. Our politicians
don"t work for those who voted for them but rather for
a foreign country ....ciao

(COMMENT)

Irrelevant. While this might have some importants to non-Americans, in the context of a "true American," ancestry is of little to no importance. It is about who you are and what you do. Deeds are what is important.

(COMMENT)

  • WMD presents a threat when in the hands of a rouge government or non-state actors. It is a concern to every major nation.
  • Yes, we know all about the PNAC and the impact that it had on the national security decision making process. But it has no real connection to the Jewish Ancestry of the leadership involved. The leadership was incompetent and extremely arrogant. They tended to dismiss, distort and deny critical elements of information that tended to question the agenda they had. It lead to both unsound and invalid critical thinking. This happens from time to time with key official that believe themselves to be above the capacity of making a mistake. This happened with the "Whiz Kids" in the 1960's and Vietnam.
  • The purpose was to establish a "hegemony" for the US. While it might have made a difference to the settlement between the Palestinians and Israelis, its real intent was to set the base of power for the US.
  • AIPAC is a problem, but there are several lobbies that pose similar problems. AIPAC poses more of a problem to the overall Israeli relationship with the US, in that non-members will begin to gradually turn against it as a threat controlled by a foreign power.

(COMMENT)

This is nonsense (respectfully). Americans simply don't think in these terms. This is just fear mongering.

Eventually, US support to Israel will be irrelevant. The US will no longer be able to afford intervention in the Middle East conflict; either on the pro-Israeli side or the pro-Palestinian side. The US is turning into an economic disaster and will not be able to maintain its military superiority. Without that military superiority, it will no longer be "persuasive in peace - or - invincible in war."

Most Respectfully - An Opposing View,
R


(COMMENT)

Irrelevant. While this might have some importants to non-Americans, in the context of a "true American," ancestry is of little to no importance. It is about who you are and what you do. Deeds are what is important.

(COMMENT)

  • WMD presents a threat when in the hands of a rouge government or non-state actors. It is a concern to every major nation.
  • Yes, we know all about the PNAC and the impact that it had on the national security decision making process. But it has no real connection to the Jewish Ancestry of the leadership involved. The leadership was incompetent and extremely arrogant. They tended to dismiss, distort and deny critical elements of information
 
Werbung:
(COMMENT)

Irrelevant. While this might have some importants to non-Americans, in the context of a "true American," ancestry is of little to no importance. It is about who you are and what you do. Deeds are what is important.

(COMMENT)

  • WMD presents a threat when in the hands of a rouge government or non-state actors. It is a concern to every major nation.
  • Yes, we know all about the PNAC and the impact that it had on the national security decision making process. But it has no real connection to the Jewish Ancestry of the leadership involved. The leadership was incompetent and extremely arrogant. They tended to dismiss, distort and deny critical elements of information


  • Salve...You have good points ,my friend. Our politicians
    don"t work for those who voted for them but rather for
    a foreign country ....ciao get back to you.
 
Back
Top