Reply to thread

Not really.  I've heard her speak once, and read a few of her columns.


More to the point, I love proving things you say false.  It's fun for me, and not too difficult.


Here, I'll do it again.


In the link you posted here, they list a few supposed mistakes or factual errors.  Yet in reading just what they posted, you see they made up a straw-man argument, and attacked it.


Ann Coulter claimed that those supporting sex education refuse to accept moral grounds.  To support that, she cites




Second, Ann Coulter says that sex education supporters want to teach Kindergartners sex education.   Now, the source for that isn't in the text quoted, but anyone who paid attention prior, knows about (SB0099) Comprehensive Health Education Program in Illinois.  This Obama supported bill, would require schools to have a comprehensive sex education course as follows:




Other parts of the bill talk about all manor of sexual activity, but specifics about fisting or other acts are not mentioned.  So where did she get that?




That checks out, now doesn't it?


So what was Media Matters beef?    They claimed that Coulter was wrong in quoting Dr. Beverlie Conant Sloane, because she never supported teaching kindergartners fisting, as they say Coulter suggested.


But in reading the quote from Coulters book again, that's not what she said.  In fact, she didn't even say that kindergartners were going to be taught fisting.  This is the made up straw-man that Media Matters attacked.


She said that sex education supporters are Amoralists, which the quote proves true.   And she said that students would be taught all manor of sexual behavior, which the MassNews link proves true.   And she said this would be done in the name of protecting kindergarteners from the scourge of AIDS, which also is true.


In effect, once again, everything she said was absolutely correct.  And you, Mr. Shaman with your bias Media Matters cite, is completely wrong.   For the sake of sparing time, I'll leave the others.  If you wish me to debunk them for you to, let me know.  I'll be more than happy to prove you wrong again... and again... and again... :)


Back
Top