I'm going to start this over real quick, just to see if the problem is that the topic wasn't expressly printed. I realized that I had responded to Shaman, and thus assumed he knew exactly what was written. But between you and me, you have not, and still haven't caught on to the whole point. I want to believe this isn't a willful choice, but rather just not know what is being discussed.
Shaman, based on the Media Matters cite, claims Ann Coulter lies. So, on that cite, I pulled one of their claimed examples that Ann lied. Here is the entire section, as printed on Media Matters page:
This is the entire actual quote from her book, assuming that the Media Matters cite is accurate in it's reprint.
The only question on the table in this thread is: Was this accurate or not?
I suggest that it is. I gave references and examples of how this quote is proved true. Now as for your question...
Does the statement "...there would be no moralizing when it came to sex." equal the statement "My job is not to teach one right value system.".
My answer is, yes. To me those are clearly equal. One says they won't teach morals with sex education, and the other says... they won't teach morals with sex education. To me, they are the same.
That is not the topic of this thread, nor related to the question at hand, and honestly, I don't really care about the gay issue as much as you seem to. I don't get worked up about it. And as it relates to Fistgate, if I was in Mass. and my tax money was funding it, I may care more. Since I'm not funding it, and my kids are absolutely not going to a public school... I just really... it doesn't matter that much to me.
Again, as I said before the one and only reason I even bothered to look up the topic, was to use it as evidence of validity of Ann Coulters point. Not that I care much about something that happened in another state, in public schools there that I don't fund, and will never use.
Ah, I see. Well I hate to break it to you, but only G-d determines marriage. You might be able to get your state to recognize your temporary marriage for the next 70 years, here now, but when you face G-d for eternity, there will not be any marriage, but his marriage.
As for this short life we have at this moment, you will never convince me to support what I know is ungodly, ever. This thread could go on for the next year, and you simply will not get me to turn away from G-d's law. Nothing personal... I obey G-d first, and man always a distant second.
See, you are bias. Again, not trying to be mean, but everyone who knows history well, knows the reason Joan of Arc dressed in mens clothes was because she was raped while in prison, and by cross dressing, she prevented further violations or her body. That's all.
Let me guess... a gay persons wrote a book on Joan being gay, and you believed it? Do tell, what's the source for this claim?
