If the word of G-d explicitly states something is evil or sinful, he will never call someone to do that thing. G-d never contradicts himself. Other than that, yes to all of those.
No I did not. To be married and to not be married, are both good. The prior statement is not exclusive. It is possible for two things to be good, yes? It is possible for it to be good to not get married, and good to get married, yes? Or do you operate under the fallacy of Affirming a disjunct? If A is true, then B must be false?
Actually it matches up very well. Most of the supposed alterations are either names of locations that are translated from Hebrew to Greek, or simply style differences common to Alexandrian manuscripts. I've heard this before too. Nothing to it.
God affirms his protection in the Bible. As for the matching of the scrolls, I've done my homework on it.
And yet you do not follow the clearly written word. So who is really in control?
It is important to support the law of G-d. That supersedes all.
My story is straight thank you. If I gave all, would I not be poor?
Thank you but I can read my Bible, and I know I'm right. Can you?
No, you are damned already. Until you accept the gift of salvation, G-d does not need to do anything, because you are condemned already.
I said neither of those anywhere. Why do you read into what is written and consistently invent your own statements? This is called a straw-man.
