Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

"Micro evolution yes, macro evolution? I see no compelling evidence. If there is some, by all means show it. If life didn't arise from non living material here on earth, you have opened the door wide for intelligent design and your macro evolutionary theory is out the window."

Slippery slope. Even if you could disprove evolution, that doesn't lead to the conclusion that intelligent design is the right answer. Like I've said already, it isn't enough to refute a theory. You must have an alternative in the wings that actually works and works better than the current theory. ID fails at every level yo can think of, not to mention the fact that it isn't science at all, but a fuindamentalist religious doctrine. You did even bother to read the Dover decsion?

I've presented you with a link to the evidence you requested with regard to macroevolution. You've yet to comment on any of it, and yet here you are still asking for proof. Well? What's the deal?

<blockquote data-quote="orogenicman" data-source="post: 144608" data-attributes="member: 2797">&quot;Micro evolution yes, macro evolution? I see no compelling evidence. If there is some, by all means show it. If life didn&#039;t arise from non living material here on earth, you have opened the door wide for intelligent design and your macro evolutionary theory is out the window.&quot;Slippery slope.&nbsp; Even if you could disprove evolution, that doesn&#039;t lead to the conclusion that intelligent design is the right answer.&nbsp; Like I&#039;ve said already, it isn&#039;t enough to refute a theory.&nbsp; You must have an alternative in the wings that actually works and works better than the current theory.&nbsp; ID fails at every level yo can think of, not to mention the fact that it isn&#039;t science at all, but a fuindamentalist religious doctrine.&nbsp; You did even bother to read the Dover decsion?I&#039;ve presented you with a link to the evidence you requested with regard to macroevolution.&nbsp; You&#039;ve yet to comment on any of it, and yet here you are still asking for proof.&nbsp; Well?&nbsp; What&#039;s the deal?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="orogenicman, post: 144608, member: 2797"] "Micro evolution yes, macro evolution? I see no compelling evidence. If there is some, by all means show it. [B]If life didn't arise from non living material here on earth, you have opened the door wide for intelligent design [/B]and your macro evolutionary theory is out the window." Slippery slope. Even if you could disprove evolution, that doesn't lead to the conclusion that intelligent design is the right answer. Like I've said already, it isn't enough to refute a theory. You must have an alternative in the wings that actually works and works better than the current theory. ID fails at every level yo can think of, not to mention the fact that it isn't science at all, but a fuindamentalist religious doctrine. You did even bother to read the Dover decsion? I've presented you with a link to the evidence you requested with regard to macroevolution. You've yet to comment on any of it, and yet here you are still asking for proof. Well? What's the deal? [/QUOTE]

Verification