And more and more and more logical fallacy. Do you ever actually think anything through?
Since I am not asking you to believe anything on my say so, what you believe is meaningless. More logical fallacy.
Your "view" as you have already demonstrated is quite narrow, so you will pardon me if I don't put much stock in it.
I am the supervisor where I work and have been for over a decade. My colleagues know my views and I know theirs. Among my circle, we are all agreed that those who preach agw aren't actual scientists but the lap dogs of politicians, willing to prostitue science in exchange for grant money.
As to anger, once again, you show that you really don't have a clue. I am Santa Clause. The fact that I don't accept shoddy pseudoscience from the charlatans that produce it or the aclolytes who preach it doesn't have anything at all do do with my level of anger or lack thereof, it has to do with an analytical mind that isn't easily fooled by bright bells and whistles and a mind that doesn't feel the need to join a rquazi religious order to feel good about itself.
Once again, prove that CO2 is the culprit. You keep making the claim and making the claim and you keep being completely unable to prove it. Did you note the CO2 levels on the graph I provided? Hundreds, thousands of times higher and no runaway global warming.
I suspect all you need to know you have already ignored.
The fact that you have been reduced to hand wringing and mewling your flawed observations on my character rather than defending your positon states pretty clearly that I am pretty damned good at what I do and have bested you already.
Since you are one of those who has been duped by one of the biggest hoaxes ever perpetrated on modern society, your opinion means exactly jack squat to me. I would be more concerned if you weren't attacking me.
Now are you ready to admit that you can't substantiate your claims with any hard observed evidence or will you continue with the mental masturbation?
