Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
My political leanings lead me to substitute nothing. Personally, I don't need a theory. I am more likely to lean towards intelligent design. More for humorous reasons than any other. If some day we manage to actually coax life from inanimate matter either through natural process or via a process that could never happen in nature, I imagine that life growing and developing over the ages with some tweaking from us here and there an injection of DNA for this and that. And a billion years later after we are long gone, if intelligent life arose from that experiment, I can hear them exclaiming that the idea of intelligent design is perposterous.I already have. You have not presented a whit of evidence that conservatives must reject scientific theories while you have provided ample data to support my claim that your position with regard to AGW is a product of your political leanings, and not any scientific knowledge. In one stroke I have provided more actual observed data than you will ever be able to come up with.I said that liberals tend to accept theories based on their political leanings. You accept AGW based on politics. You have admitted that you don't grasp the science but you accept anyway because of the politics associated with the issue.
My political leanings lead me to substitute nothing. Personally, I don't need a theory. I am more likely to lean towards intelligent design. More for humorous reasons than any other. If some day we manage to actually coax life from inanimate matter either through natural process or via a process that could never happen in nature, I imagine that life growing and developing over the ages with some tweaking from us here and there an injection of DNA for this and that. And a billion years later after we are long gone, if intelligent life arose from that experiment, I can hear them exclaiming that the idea of intelligent design is perposterous.
I already have. You have not presented a whit of evidence that conservatives must reject scientific theories while you have provided ample data to support my claim that your position with regard to AGW is a product of your political leanings, and not any scientific knowledge. In one stroke I have provided more actual observed data than you will ever be able to come up with.
I said that liberals tend to accept theories based on their political leanings. You accept AGW based on politics. You have admitted that you don't grasp the science but you accept anyway because of the politics associated with the issue.
