Then the answer is YES, you think you should get to decide what criticism of AGW is legitimate and what is not... Who is qualified to criticise AGW and who is not... Yet another example of your double standards.
You just pointed out that PLC stated personal attacks were not permitted, is this another of your double standards where you think you get to make the rules but don't have to follow them?
And again, you seem to be able to properly quote others without a problem but insist on not doing the same for me... Is that some kind of "rude and unprofessional tactic"?
This may come as a shock but the climate has never been static...
What caused climatic shifts prior to industrialization?
Why are such causes no longer seen as legitimate drivers of climate change?
You've repeatedly stated that man puts about 6 billion tons (if I recall correctly) of CO2 into the atmosphere every year...
What is the total amount of CO2 put into the atmosphere every year from all sources?
If you don't know the answer to that question, Pale does, I'm sure he'd be happy to help you learn something new. I've already met my quota by informing you that the climate has never been static. 
