Reply to thread

"Then the answer is YES, you think you should get to decide what criticism of AGW is legitimate and what is not... Who is qualified to criticise AGW and who is not... Yet another example of your double standards."


No sir.  I think that thinking minds are pretty convenient. Was that in any way unclear?  Look, I think science matters shoud be left to the scientists to decide.  They know a heck of a lot more about it than the layman on the street does. Now, they layman on the street is certainly within his rights to critisize if, even if he doesn't know what he is talking about.  But lets be clear here.  I'm talking about peer review, not idle gossip.


Back
Top