Hmm, AGU 2004, ESA 2004, AGU 2005, Springer 2008, Springer 2008, and '92, '95 '06, and '07 data came in for 2009, and I have to log in, to see what they had to say, or download a PDF file, and by now, I can see your trend.
Let's review some links, from 2012, shall we?
http://sio.ucsd.edu/Ocean_Acidification/
http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/12/study-links-raised-carbon-dioxide-levels-to-oyster-die-offs/
http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/co2/story/Northwest+Oyster+Die-offs+Show+Ocean+Acidification+Has+Arrived
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/06/27/study-kardashians-get-40-times-more-news-covera/186703
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/120301143735.htm
You might want to review 'current' articles, about the ocean, since you are so hysterical, as to read and refer out-dated links. Just imagine how your pulse can get going, if you read some of this exciting material, from 2012? I don't know what you are talking about, with your "hysteria," really.
But since you subscribe to hysteria, support your rants, with out-dated links, and you seem to enjoy the process, try getting really buzzed, on 2012 media. Whee! Whoop! Get it on, pr.
OA should be suspected, as a contributing cause, to failure, of the obviously over-fished cod. OR DON'T YOU SEE HOW THE RELATIVELY ACIDIC WATER IS WHERE THEIR EGGS ARE ENDING UP?
