I just calls em as I sees them bob. Claiming victory when you haven't scored a single point is a sure sign of delusion bob. Get a grip.
Sorry bob, but it isn't happening at all. But do feel free to name a single life form that has died off due to ocean acidification. Tell me bob, what do you think the ph levels of the ocean might have been when atmospheric CO2 levels were between 3000 and 7000 ppm? And if such atmospheric CO2 levels are so deadly, how is it that the modern forms of most marine life evolved at a time when such levels were the norm? Explain please.
So you say, but it is me who is able to support my position bob. It is you who has yet to name a single physical law that supports or predicts a greenhouse effect as claimed by climate science. It is you who is unable to name a single species that has gone extinct due to climate change and yet you claim that we are in the midst of a climate driven mass extinction. It is you who claims that historically low levels of atmospheric CO2 are going to acidify the oceans to the point of killing off marine life as we know it when the fact is that marine life as we know it evolved during a time when atmospheric CO2 levels were orders of magnitude higher than present. All those claims bob and not a shred of hard evidence to support them.
And of course I don't expect you to hang around and suffer the public embarassment you are experiencing.
Sorry bob, you are wrong again. And if you knew how to operate the search feature on this board, you would see that I have posts scattered across the board. And asking you to provide some bit of hard, observed evidence to support your claims is not a baiting game. It does provide positive proof, however, that you don't have the slightest clue as to what you are talking about.
Again, bob, it is you who has failed and everyone here knows it. The links I posted regarding OA disproved your claims aside from the fact that simple observation proves you wrong. In the mind of believers like you, anything that doesn't support your view is junk.
Again, you claim that OA always kills ocean life but remain unable to explain how it is that most modern marine invertebrates evolved during a time when atmospheric CO2 levels were in the 3000 to 7000 ppm range. If 400, or 500, or even 1000 ppm is a threat to the oceans, how did modern forms of marine invertebrates evolve with atmospheric CO2 levels so high.
These are legitimate questions bob. I expect answers. Got any?
I don't believe in the tooth fairy, leprechauns, or cave trolls either bob. Why should I believe in bakradiation when not a single law of physics supports the hypothesis and at least 3 say that it is not possible? And why should I believe a fast shift in CO2 preceeds OA or mass extinction when not a shred of evidence exists to support such a claim? You keep making wild claims that you simply can not support and when asked for proof, or at least some sort of hard evidence, you, like all warmers switch to invective and inslult rather than supporting your argument.
I suppose that makes sense to you in some odd way. Of course, an unphysical phenomenon like backradiation makes sense to you also.
