Did you read the stupid article? Unbelievable how shamelessly liberals lie, or are unapologetically ignorant.
Here, let me repost exactly what the article says, because far from "debunking", it actually proves the whole point!
The article showed conclusively that Ford, which is in the best financial position, still pays it's workers $55/hr, which is at least $10/hr over the none Union Japanese workers.
HOWEVER, because of Union contracted legacy cost, it costs another $15 per hour over that... resulting in the universally known $70 dollar per hour mark. The Article did not debunk anything. It proved the exact point everyone has been making.
Oh and by the way, did you ever wonder why they choose to look at Ford, who is in the best shape, instead of comparing GM which is in the worst? Hint, it's called 'media basis'.
Next time read your own sources. You look plain stupid now. You are right up there with "Republicans vote against Mothersday" and Shamans Ann Coulter quotes.
Absolute stupidity.... and amazingly contradictory to everything the other liberals have been saying. If you listened to the likes of Top Gun, you'd think that Honda produces the best most wonderful god sent machines on the planet, that Toyota was literally a holy manufacturer.
Yet here you claim if people are paid less they will produce crap? But wait... the sacred auto makers from the East, pay their people less. So how do you figure this?
Whoa whoa whoa, you just said the other bailout didn't have any restrictions on CEOs, now it does, but the Republicans fought against it? Idiocy.
Here's a quote from the ranking Republican on the Senate banking committee:
Yes Pualson was against it, but Republicans were not.
I have no interest in justifying it. I was against the Barack Bail-outs to begin with. Read this...
In other words, the republicans were against letting CEOs walk off with your tax money for more than democrats were. The conservative plan was to have a market based solution that left the risk and rewards, ultimately in the hands of private business. In other words, the CEOs, if they got any money, would be their own.
Instead, we went the democrap way of handing out your tax money to them, and they happily went off with it, while you gripe about some restrictions on pay. Oh well gee... that went well. The economy is still crappy, the CEOs are still walking off with $700 billion of our money, and you are still trying to blame republicans for your own stupidity. Is this Obama's 'hope and change' you kept telling us about?
You just proved BigRob's point about Fishman not being the one who drove WaMu into the ground. That was his whole point, and you just provided the evidence you claimed he didn't have. Can't you see who ignorant this is?
But let's move on...
This is why Bailouts are bad. The CEO came into his office, successfully convinced some government air heads to give him money, and left with it.... and you want to blame Republicans which were opposed to the bailout to begin with? This is your 'hope and change'?
I'm convinced more and more, liberals are like ten-year-olds that refuse to accept responsibility for what they themselves did.
Now, Timmy, what did you do?
"It wasn't me! It was Bobby! He made me hit my sister!"
Hey... grow up you liberals. Time to own up for your mistakes.
