Be Advised!

Greco

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2008
Messages
634
Almost immediately after Richard Reid attempted his act of terrorism as "The Shoe Bomber", Homeland Security adopted the airport screening method requiring everyone to remove their shoes. Now we have Farouk Abdul Mutallab, "The Underwear Bomber", who used the same, easily concealed explosive material employed by Richard Reid. Only a faulty detonator averted certain disaster from this powerful explosive.

Homeland Security has announced that by the end of February they will have underwear removal stations installed at all airport scanning stations. Passengers will be required to enter the chest-high box, remove their underwear for examination and scanning, before being allowed entry to the concourse. Those that arrive at an airport, sans underwear commando style, will be subject to added scrutiny, which they didn't detail. After retrieving your scanned items, including your underwear, passengers will be free to locate the nearest restroom and put their underwear back on. In addition to maintaining a "no fly" list, they're creating and instituting a "no spy" list. They commented that Transportation Security Officers will be strictly enforcing a no loitering policy at the end of the screening station with the intent to block perverts and voyeurs from attempting to watch females retrieve their thongs. The former Republican Senator from Idaho, Larry Craig, has the distinction of being the first name added to the new "no spy" underwear watch list banning him from looking for briefs and boxers.

Amtrak is looking better and better.
 
Werbung:
What the Republicans never can grasp is the fact that if the ACLU's argument isn't constitutional, they won't prevail. If they do win, it will be based on constitutional merits. Obviously you're one of those "I hate America, I hate The Constitution" Republicans.
 
What the Republicans never can grasp is the fact that if the ACLU's argument isn't constitutional, they won't prevail. If they do win, it will be based on constitutional merits. Obviously you're one of those "I hate America, I hate The Constitution" Republicans.

It is nice to know there are Americans who still believe our Constitution is the law of the land. How quaint.
 
Oh there are plenty of us that believe that. That's one of the reasons why Americans turned out in huge numbers to elect Barack Obama, after eight disasterous years of Republicans helping George W. Bush attack The Constitution.

Remember, it was George W. Bush that said this about The Constitution, "It's just a goddamn piece of paper."
 
White House cabinet meeting to discuss the renewal of the Patriot Act, in response to GOP leaders presenting a valid case that the Patriot Act undermined the Constitution. Doug Thompson, Capital Hill Blue, Dec 5, 2005 http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml

"I don't give a goddamn. I'm the Presidentand the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way. ...
Stop throwing the Constitution in my face. It's just a goddamned piece of paper!"
 
Werbung:
White House cabinet meeting to discuss the renewal of the Patriot Act, in response to GOP leaders presenting a valid case that the Patriot Act undermined the Constitution. Doug Thompson, Capital Hill Blue, Dec 5, 2005 http://www.capitolhillblue.com/artman/publish/article_7779.shtml

"I don't give a goddamn. I'm the Presidentand the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way. ...
Stop throwing the Constitution in my face. It's just a goddamned piece of paper!"

I did try and look, couldnt find it on any newspaper or online news, just strange off beat websites, so I went to fact check and this is what they said. I dont know if its true or not, if it is that really is disgusting. But it seems if it is true at least one of the three who claimed to hear it would have spoken up by now. So I dont know. But its interesting that in all these years I have never heard anyone say it till now, thanks for the new info.

December 12, 2007
Q: Did President Bush call the Constitution a "goddamned piece of paper?"
Is it true that President Bush called the Constitution a "goddamned piece of paper?" He has never denied it, and it appears that there were several witnesses.
A: Extremely unlikely. The Web site that reported those words has a history of quoting phony sources and retracting bogus stories.
The report that Bush "screamed" those words at Republican congressional leaders in November 2005 is unsubstantiated, to put it charitably.

We judge that the odds that the report is accurate hover near zero. It comes from Capitol Hill Blue, a Web site that has a history of relying on phony sources, retracting stories and apologizing to its readers.


The Quote


The report was posted on Dec. 5, 2005. According to author, Doug Thompson, unnamed Republican leaders complained to Bush during a White House meeting about "onerous" portions of the USA Patriot Act, prompting the following:
Capitol Hill Blue: “I don’t give a goddamn,” Bush retorted. “I’m the President and the Commander-in-Chief. Do it my way.”

“Mr. President,” one aide in the meeting said. “There is a valid case that the provisions in this law undermine the Constitution.”

“Stop throwing the Constitution in my face,” Bush screamed back. “It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”

The evidence


There's no record of Bush ever using these words in public and no other news organization has reported him using them privately. Thompson based his report on three sources whom he didn't name. He gave the date of the quote as "last month," which would put it sometime in November 2005.

Thompson told us he once removed the story from his Web site when others raised doubts and no other news organization came up with a similar story. But he said he later reinstated it and currently believes it to be true. "I wrote the story and I stand by it," Thompson said in a telephone interview.

Thompson told us he based the story on e-mail messages from three persons he knows, all of whom claim to have been present at a White House meeting and to have heard Bush make the statement. He said he finds their account credible: "Sometimes I just have to go with my gut, and my gut tells me he did say this."


The unreliable gut


Thompson's "gut" has proven to be a unreliable guide in the past, however. He has admitted quoting trusted sources in the past who later turned out to be frauds -- twice.

•In 2003 Thompson confessed that he had been "conned big time" by a source who claimed to be a former CIA contract consultant named Terrance J. Wilkinson. Thompson quoted this "source" as claiming to be present at two White House meetings in which Bush ignored intelligence officials' doubts about reports of Iraq seeking uranium. Thompson said he had been relying on the same man for two decades and had "no doubt" about his credibility, only to discover that "someone has been running a con on me for 20 some years and I fell for it like a little old lady in a pigeon drop scheme." He erased a number of stories from the site that had been based on information from "Wilkinson" and deleted anonymous quotes given to him by "Wilkinson" from other stories.

Thompson said then: "It will be a long time (and perhaps never) before I trust someone else who comes forward and offers inside information. The next one who does had better be prepared to produce a birth certificate, a driver's license and his grandmother's maiden name."


•That was two years before the "piece of paper" quote attributed to three unnamed sources. But, far from demanding solid proof, Thompson continued to quote at least one more phony source until 2006, when a blogger started to question the existence of "George Harleigh." Thompson had for years quoted this supposed former Nixon and Bush appointee. But when no records of such a man could be found, Thompson admitted he had never even met him:

Doug Thompson (July 26, 2006): We would get quotes via email on current topics. He claimed to be a retired political science professor from Southern Illinois University and an appointee of both the Nixon and Bush administration. I was told he had been checked out. But he wasn't who he said he was and we used his phony name in stories.

This time Thompson says he revised or deleted 83 stories that had relied on information from "Harleigh" or quoted him.
In his defense, Thompson says: "[The] 83 articles that we revised or removed represent less than 1 percent of the total production of this Web site over the past 13 years. While errors must never be condoned, a 99+ percent of accuracy is a percentage I can live with. "

But we also note that Thompson described his own reporting habits this way:

Doug Thompson (July 26, 2006): I started taking more chances with stories, jumping on ones with sketchy sources, always trying to outdo the last "big" story. I had people willing to help me and they would send me info that I used often on their word alone.

. . . I wrote stories based on emails from sources I never met. I would meet self-proclaimed "important people" in out-of-the way bars, taking what they told me at face value. Washington is a breeding ground for phonies and wannabes. Too often I printed what they told me because I was so full of myself that I was sure it was true and did not require further verification.

By Thompson's own account, these were the habits still in place when he reported the "piece of paper" quote in 2005.

We also note that Thompson expresses extreme personal hostility toward Bush, calling him in one recent article a "madman," a "despot," and "a man without honor, a leader without conscience and a human being without a shred of decency or humanity."

Thompson is a former Republican congressional aide and political consultant. He was manager of the National Association of Realtors political action committee for several years, ending in 1992. But his experience as a journalist prior to launching Capitol Hill Blue was limited to working as a local reporter at the Roanoke Times and a columnist at The Telegraph (Alton, Ill.), ending in 1981. He currently lives and works from his home near the town of Floyd in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia, nearly 290 miles away from the White House.


Good advice


Capitol Hill Blue does offer one sound bit of advice, under the heading of "Just the FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions):"
Capitol Hill Blue:

Should we believe what you print simply because you say it is so?

Absolutely not. You should read many publications and draw your own conclusions.

We agree with that. Even taking Thompson at his word, and dismissing the possibility that he just made up his quotes and sources, we conclude that the "piece of paper" quote is probably about as genuine as "George Harleigh" or the phony CIA "source" whom Thompson quoted in 2003.

-Brooks Jackson


Sources
Doug Thompson, "Bush on the Constitution: ‘It’s just a goddamned piece of paper’" CapitolHillBlue.com 5 Dec. 2005.

Doug Thompson, "Conned big time," 9 July 2003.

Doug Thompson, "Screwing the Pooch," 25 July 2006.

Doug Thompson, "The eyes of a madman" CapitolHillBlue.com 6 Dec 2007.




http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/did_president_bush_call_the_constitution_a.html
 
Back
Top