Reply to thread

That whole they need a gun to protect themselves at Presidential events is a big Red Herring.


They're trying to make a broader point that they can own & carry a gun. The problem lies in just what you said. It gives cover of normalcy to any nutjob that wants to get a weapon close to our President.


The rational thing to do is widen the no gun zone around any Presidential or Congressional event. I mean it's not like they can carry them into the building anyway. The Secret Service would put them so far under the jail they'd have to pump sunshine into them if they tried that.:)  


The solution is to just push the guns a little further away from the elected officials. Widen the no gun zone perimeter to say a half mile circle around the event. 


Back
Top