Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
"WVKO went off the air on May 5, 2006 due to the upcoming expiration of its transmitter land lease and major financial issues. The station moved to another transmitter site in 2007, at which point it returned to the air. [2]The reality is that a catholic group did come in and bought the failing station. Did the owners sell it at a loss or at a profit? Since you seem to think they were doing great it is a safe bet that they would have sold at a profit. Meaning that they would have even more money to go out and start up again and to do so better funded. But again reality is that they would have sold at a loss and probably did not have enough money to start up again. Though we know they wanted to because they are still playing reruns on their website.I bet any group could have come in to buy out that station - that is the American way. Why some other progressive group could have bought it. But progressive radio almost always fails because it does not lend itself well to soundbites and slogans but instead to in depth analysis which is why conservatism thrives on radio.How would that be fair if no one wanted to listen to, say, right wing channels? Those right wing channels would not be profitable. Would the government fund them? And what about the "green party"?You already have ABC, NBC, CNN...
"WVKO went off the air on May 5, 2006 due to the upcoming expiration of its transmitter land lease and major financial issues. The station moved to another transmitter site in 2007, at which point it returned to the air. [2]
The reality is that a catholic group did come in and bought the failing station. Did the owners sell it at a loss or at a profit? Since you seem to think they were doing great it is a safe bet that they would have sold at a profit. Meaning that they would have even more money to go out and start up again and to do so better funded. But again reality is that they would have sold at a loss and probably did not have enough money to start up again. Though we know they wanted to because they are still playing reruns on their website.
I bet any group could have come in to buy out that station - that is the American way. Why some other progressive group could have bought it. But progressive radio almost always fails because it does not lend itself well to soundbites and slogans but instead to in depth analysis which is why conservatism thrives on radio.
How would that be fair if no one wanted to listen to, say, right wing channels? Those right wing channels would not be profitable. Would the government fund them? And what about the "green party"?
You already have ABC, NBC, CNN...
