Citizens United; When MORE Is NEVER ENOUGH!!!!!

Phoenix68

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2022
Messages
17,055
"Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court regarding campaign finance laws, in which the Court found that laws restricting the political $pending of corporations and unions are inconsistent with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court's 5–4 ruling in favor of Citizens United sparked significant controversy, with some viewing it as a defense of American principles of free speech and a safeguard against government overreach, while others criticized it as promoting corporate personhood and granting disproportionate political power to large corporations."
.
 
Werbung:
"Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court regarding campaign finance laws, in which the Court found that laws restricting the political $pending of corporations and unions are inconsistent with the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The Supreme Court's 5–4 ruling in favor of Citizens United sparked significant controversy, with some viewing it as a defense of American principles of free speech and a safeguard against government overreach, while others criticized it as promoting corporate personhood and granting disproportionate political power to large corporations."
.
The SCOTUS decision in the Citizens United case flung open the doors to wealthy democrat donors like George Soros to flood the campaign coffers of far left ideologues with cash.
 
"Ever since the Supremos shattered campaign finance law with its decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010, Americans have been told there are only two ways to stop corporate and “dark” money in politics: Amend the U.S. Constitution or wait for the court to undo what it has done.
.
That is flat
wrong.
.
The underlying authority to define and limit
corporate powers never disappeared. It simply went quiet: unused, untested, and unmentioned—until now. This report names that authority, explains it, and shows how states can reclaim it to, in effect, undo Citizens United by executing a reset of their corporations’ powers. The sovereign authority to decide which powers states grant to the corporations they charter includes the authority to not grant their corporations the power to $pend in politics."
.
b8f67428-3de5-425e-8318-bb83e4d1a667[1].webp
.
 
"Ever since the Supremos shattered campaign finance law with its decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010, Americans have been told there are only two ways to stop corporate and “dark” money in politics: Amend the U.S. Constitution or wait for the court to undo what it has done.
.
That is flat
wrong.
.
The underlying authority to define and limit
corporate powers never disappeared. It simply went quiet: unused, untested, and unmentioned—until now. This report names that authority, explains it, and shows how states can reclaim it to, in effect, undo Citizens United by executing a reset of their corporations’ powers. The sovereign authority to decide which powers states grant to the corporations they charter includes the authority to not grant their corporations the power to $pend in politics."
In spite of all the talk, democrats have never stopped People like George Soros or organizations like Planned Parenthood from kicking back hundreds of millions of dollars to democrat candidacies from money funded to them by leftist political powers.
 
In spite of all the talk, democrats have never stopped People like George Soros or organizations like Planned Parenthood from kicking back hundreds of millions of dollars to democrat candidacies from money funded to them by leftist political powers.
.
yellow-smiley-confused-emoticon[1].gif
.
being-confused-smiley-emoticon[1].gif
.

Yeah.....no proof of that....as usual.....
.
 
Last edited:
Werbung:
Back
Top