Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
First of all, you have completely changed topics. This has nothing to do with the "hide the decline" lie we were discussing. Secondly, you have swallowed yet another lie by the skeptics. The decline in the number of Canadian Stations used is not caused by cherry-picking of the stations. It is caused because people have to compile the temperature records for those stations by hand, and it has historically taken decades for people to do this. The stations from the 1970s are only recently being included. So maybe in 2030 or 2040 all of the stations recording today's temperatures will be included. Further, if they *were* cherry picked, the ones that are not included would be the with colder temperature records. This is absolutely not the case. See here.This is not the sort of false accusation that someone makes by accident. If the accusers just asked why the stations weren't being used it would be obvious that there is a rational explanation for it. It is clearly a malicious lie that is very effective because it looks damning and convincing, just like with the lie about the New Zealand cherry-picking that was pointed out earlier, I think by you.
First of all, you have completely changed topics. This has nothing to do with the "hide the decline" lie we were discussing. Secondly, you have swallowed yet another lie by the skeptics. The decline in the number of Canadian Stations used is not caused by cherry-picking of the stations. It is caused because people have to compile the temperature records for those stations by hand, and it has historically taken decades for people to do this. The stations from the 1970s are only recently being included. So maybe in 2030 or 2040 all of the stations recording today's temperatures will be included. Further, if they *were* cherry picked, the ones that are not included would be the with colder temperature records. This is absolutely not the case. See here.
This is not the sort of false accusation that someone makes by accident. If the accusers just asked why the stations weren't being used it would be obvious that there is a rational explanation for it. It is clearly a malicious lie that is very effective because it looks damning and convincing, just like with the lie about the New Zealand cherry-picking that was pointed out earlier, I think by you.
