Could Obama get impeached next year?

steveox

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
7,499
Location
Way Down South
All these scandals unfolding the same course that happened during Richard Nixons presidency. Watergate hearings started in May 1973. and then Nixon congressional committee all voted to impeach him in july 1974 and then in second week of august Nixon resigns. Could the same path happen to Obama?
 
Werbung:
Someone from his side of the fence would have to drop a really big bomb in his lap for that to happen. There is no way a Republican would impeach America's first Black President.
 
Just wait until Midterms come. All the democrats will be booted out by TEA PARTY
Maybe not ....

After 2010 is when Obama started targeting the TEA Party groups, preventing them from getting a tax exemption prevented them from receiving donations and getting the word out! What Obama effectively did was stop the funding to the TEA Party groups thus stopping them in their tracks. This is one reason the 2012 election was so bad!! Who's to say that tactic will not still be effective next year.
 
Maybe not ....

After 2010 is when Obama started targeting the TEA Party groups, preventing them from getting a tax exemption prevented them from receiving donations and getting the word out! What Obama effectively did was stop the funding to the TEA Party groups thus stopping them in their tracks. This is one reason the 2012 election was so bad!! Who's to say that tactic will not still be effective next year.

in the early days it was about people, not contributions. the GOP fell into the trap of thinking ad money was all you need. Dems showed everyone that it really is abouts votes cast. nobody watches ads anymore.
 
You see back in 70s Republicans did the right thing. They wouldn't protect Mr Nixon. But When Clinton in his Sex scandal Democrats protected him from Impeachment.
 
Werbung:
He will not be impeached but if he were working in the private sector he would have been fired a long time ago.. 3 scandals And he new nothing about any of them. You know in the mid- 1980's, President Reagan loved to talk about eroding family values. He saw it as a crisis. I did not but as I look back, I think Reagan had it right. In fact he may have understated it. Here is a quote from a 1986 Reagan radio address. Please pay attention to those values he finds most important and specifically submits...

That last word, "family," is one that I'd like to consider for a moment. To be sure, family is very much on our minds during the holidays, as children and grandchildren, parents and grandparents, gather to share the happiness of the season. We know how good it feels to be with our families—how it warms and comforts us, how it gives us strength and joy. But I wonder whether we always give our families all the appreciation they deserve. Consider, for example, that the philosopher-historians Will and Ariel Durant called the family "the nucleus of civilization." They understood that all those aspects of civilized life that we most deeply cherish—freedom, the rule of law, economic prosperity and opportunity—that all these depend upon the strength and integrity of the family. If you think about it, you'll see that it's in the family that we must all learn the fundamental lesson of life—right and wrong, respect for others, self-discipline, the importance of knowledge, and, yes, a sense of our own self-worth. All of our lives, it's the love of our families that sustains us when times are hard. And it is perhaps above all to provide for our children that we work and save.

Reagan was talking about civilized life. He referred to the family as the nucleus of civilization. He talked about freedom and the rule of law- and the fundamental lessons of life. Teaching right and wrong, respect for others, self discipline, and knowledge.

What we are seeing today is a crisis of leadership. Our leaders are self absorbed and selfish politicians. They would rather get some sleep or protect their chances of winning some future nomination rather than perform the fundamental job requirements of the positions they currently hold. They can't adequately perform in their current roles- while aspiring for bigger ones.

Civilized people do not go to bed or refuse requests for help when American ambassadors are being attacked and subsequently killed. Civilized people perform their jobs. When they cannot fulfill the duties of their job, they resign. Like the U.S. Secretary of State did after his failure in Mogadishu (Blackhawk Down) that cost many American lives. Civilized people feel shame. Civilized people must live with themselves when their actions or inactions get innocent people killed. Civilized people are not sociopaths.

The level of shamelessness and arrogance that this administration engages in is reprehensible. It should be met with the harshest punishment that civilized people can mete out.

The media and the left sycophants have no shame either. They are still busy living in the past- still blaming Bush every time something bad happens some 5 years later- like somehow that justifies the actions of Obama and his morally bankrupt staff. I suppose that is the "Johnny did it first!" argument that children use when defending themselves from their angry parents. They will defend, ridicule, or otherwise attack anyone trying to attach responsibility to those who are responsible for this shameful event.

Civilized people know the difference between wrong and right. Civilized people do not make excuses. Civilized people take responsibility for their horrible job performance and they do not blame the victims for the crime. They practice respect for others and self discipline.

Its to bad being civilized has nothing to do with it...he is a black man who became the president of the United States of America.. WOW.. and yet he still claims the man is holding him back...
 
Back
Top