Reply to thread

The word "interpret" is being used here as an equivocation to make illogical conclusions. :rolleyes:


"Interpret", as in "intepret the constitution", is a legal term of art which means "determine exactly how the constitution should be applied to this case".


Decades of liberal ideologues on the federal courts have changed "interpret" to mean that the constitution is like playdough, that they can make it mean anything they want, as long as they come up with a pseudo-argument to impress the rubes who still believe such quaint notions as that the cinstitution is the fundamental law of the land, and can only be changed by constitutional amendment.


Back
Top