Reply to thread

It's been nearly twenty years since that rationale stopped lending itself to justify the policy of ubiquitous US meddling.




As a matter of fact, conservatism IS about holding to that which is timeless and good.   

What is more conservative than following the very plain language and clear advice of those who founded this country ( to "avoid foreign entanglements") ?

Really,

given that you speak of an 'impotent strategy' -  what could render the United States more so, than to spread its money and the blood of its youth ...all over the globe in hopes of policing transactions in every continent of the world ?

Remember when I asked in a prior post 'why the sun set on the British Empire' ?


Take a look at history and you'll find the answer:   Great Britain spread itself too thin in just that way.


Back
Top