I wish I were. Please have a look at posts #56 through 58 of this thread. At that juncture of the conversation, I mentioned to you that I have spoken with two Muslims and I also mentioned Keith Ellison and I pointed out that none of them are "like that".
Your reply?
"Okay, that makes three".
And please recall your mantra throughout this entire thread:
"Radical Islam=Islam".
You're joking of course. He footnotes NOTHING.
His timeline is completely self reverential; go visit it again and see. All he ever says is "See blah blah blah, from Prophet of Doom", which is of course his own article.
Withdraw WHAT comment ?
Palerider, you have just illustrated perfectly what a straw man argument is.
I did not make "the claim of inaccuracies" about Mr. Winn's timeline.
In fact, what I said IN SEVERAL DIFFERENT WAYS in my posts from March 24th, was that I was sure there are conflicting opinions but I do not have the time to fact check the whole timeline so I am willing to carry on AS THOUGH it were all true.
WHY do I think there are probably conflicting opinions ?
Because there were ample conflicting opinions about the three statements of yours which I DID check.
Now how on earth can you sit here and pretend I said otherwise?
Do you really take me for such a fool that I would do the same thing that I just called Smila on, in the Israel thread ?
If so, you are a poor judge of personalities.
Then perhaps you should stop answering MY sources by telling me they are "lying".
