Democrat judge gives the SCOTUS the middle finger and demands Trump obey his imperialistic edict no matter what the SCOTUS rules.

[mark francis]

How is this leftist democrat judicial imperialism justified? Justice Jackson was soundly rebuked by 6 SCOTUS justices for promoting imperialistic judicial activism and totalitarian rule by judicial fiat.

Judge’s middle finger to the Supreme Court shows why Trump wants to move fast on deportations

 

[mark francis]

How is this leftist democrat judicial imperialism justified? Justice Jackson was soundly rebuked by 6 SCOTUS justices for promoting imperialistic judicial activism and totalitarian rule by judicial fiat.

Judge’s middle finger to the Supreme Court shows why Trump wants to move fast on deportations

This just in: SCOTUS soundly rebukes the rebellious wannabe imperialist democrat judge who defied its earlier ruling.

Boom: SCOTUS 'Clarifies' Its Stay in Sudan Deportation Case, Smacks Boston Judge Who Tried End-Around – RedState

Boom: SCOTUS 'Clarifies' Its Stay in Sudan Deportation Case, Smacks Boston Judge Who Tried End-Around

By Susie Moore | 5:45 PM on July 03, 2025


But here's the best part. As noted above, Justice Kagan, who dissented from the original stay order, concurred with today's ruling. Here, she explains why succinctly (citations omitted):

I voted to deny the Government’s previous stay application in this case, and I continue to believe that this Court should not have stayed the District Court’s April 18 order enjoining the Government from deporting non-citizens to third countries without notice or a meaningful opportunity to be heard. But a majority of this Court saw things differently, and I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this Court has stayed. Because continued enforcement of the District Court’s May 21, 2025 order would do just that, I vote to grant the Government’s motion for clarification.