mark francis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2021
- Messages
- 34,436
The democrat Russian collusion hoaxer is fighting the removal from NC voting rolls names lacking the required driver's license or social security numbers because, according to the democrat fraudster, the task of verifying those names are illegitimate is too "herculean." In other words, democrats have been claiming no serious election fraud must have occurred because they know the task of proving apparent fraud really was fraud is almost impossible to do. That does not prove there was no fraud, that proves verifying every fraudulent vote was illegitimate is too difficult a task to be undertaken, so the crooks win by committing fraud and bragging that they will not be caught.
A retirees group working with Democratic operative Marc Elias’ law firm wants to intervene in the US Justice Department’s lawsuit against North Carolina and its State Board of Elections. The suit accuses the state board of maintaining inaccurate voter rolls.
The North Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans filed a motion Monday to intervene in the case as a defendant. Lawyers from the Elias Law Group help represent the alliance.
“In both the run up to — and fallout from — the November 2024 general election, various partisan actors filed litigation seeking to cast a shadow over North Carolina’s voter rolls,” the alliance’s lawyers wrote. “The Republican National Committee, for example, filed suit just a few months before the election, seeking to have hundreds of thousands of people removed from the voter rolls because the North Carolina’s statewide voter file did not contain either a driver’s license or social security number for them.”
“Similarly, in the wake of the 2024 election, Judge Jefferson Griffin — a losing candidate for a state Supreme Court seat — sought to have tens of thousands of ballots invalidated for a similar reason,” the court filing continued. “Despite searching high and low, however, neither of these cases turned up a scrap of evidence that North Carolina’s voter rolls are not secure or contain ineligible voters.”
“Now the federal government has joined the fray, echoing the alarmist tone of these past suits,” the alliance’s lawyers argued. “It alleges that North Carolina is not complying with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), which requires state election officials to collect certain identification numbers from applicants who have them. The federal government concedes that North Carolina’s current voter registration form requires applicants to provide this information, but it alleges that it did not previously, and as a result many long-time voters registered without providing that information.”
The Justice Department “has wholly failed to concretely identify any specific voter who was registered contrary to HAVA, and instead simply assumes as much based on imperfect statewide records,” the court filing added.
“Despite its paltry allegations, the federal government asks this Court to force North Carolina to engage in a herculean data-collection process, contacting every single voter in the state whose registration file appears to be missing information and then collecting that information,” the alliance argued. “The inevitable consequence of the federal government’s lawsuit is clear: voters who cannot be contacted stand to be kicked off the rolls, even if they complied with HAVA when they registered or never had to comply with HAVA at all. The federal government’s paper-thin allegations do not warrant the heavy-handed relief it seeks, which will invariably lead to thousands of eligible North Carolinians losing their registration status.”
Elias clients seek to intervene in Justice Department lawsuit against NC
A retirees group working with Democratic operative Marc Elias’ law firm wants to intervene in the US Justice Department’s lawsuit against North Carolina and its State Board of Elections. The suit accuses the state board of maintaining inaccurate voter rolls.
The North Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans filed a motion Monday to intervene in the case as a defendant. Lawyers from the Elias Law Group help represent the alliance.
“In both the run up to — and fallout from — the November 2024 general election, various partisan actors filed litigation seeking to cast a shadow over North Carolina’s voter rolls,” the alliance’s lawyers wrote. “The Republican National Committee, for example, filed suit just a few months before the election, seeking to have hundreds of thousands of people removed from the voter rolls because the North Carolina’s statewide voter file did not contain either a driver’s license or social security number for them.”
“Similarly, in the wake of the 2024 election, Judge Jefferson Griffin — a losing candidate for a state Supreme Court seat — sought to have tens of thousands of ballots invalidated for a similar reason,” the court filing continued. “Despite searching high and low, however, neither of these cases turned up a scrap of evidence that North Carolina’s voter rolls are not secure or contain ineligible voters.”
“Now the federal government has joined the fray, echoing the alarmist tone of these past suits,” the alliance’s lawyers argued. “It alleges that North Carolina is not complying with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA), which requires state election officials to collect certain identification numbers from applicants who have them. The federal government concedes that North Carolina’s current voter registration form requires applicants to provide this information, but it alleges that it did not previously, and as a result many long-time voters registered without providing that information.”
The Justice Department “has wholly failed to concretely identify any specific voter who was registered contrary to HAVA, and instead simply assumes as much based on imperfect statewide records,” the court filing added.
“Despite its paltry allegations, the federal government asks this Court to force North Carolina to engage in a herculean data-collection process, contacting every single voter in the state whose registration file appears to be missing information and then collecting that information,” the alliance argued. “The inevitable consequence of the federal government’s lawsuit is clear: voters who cannot be contacted stand to be kicked off the rolls, even if they complied with HAVA when they registered or never had to comply with HAVA at all. The federal government’s paper-thin allegations do not warrant the heavy-handed relief it seeks, which will invariably lead to thousands of eligible North Carolinians losing their registration status.”
