Reply to thread

My whole point is that while whether it is offensive or otherwise,  I have no real argument,  it is,  to those the word's homonymic definition applies to,  for obvious reasons.   My argument is purely on the grounds of is it incorrect,   no word is incorrect unless the meaning is a misinterpretation of the word.  The use of gay in discourse to refer to something objectionable to the caller was intentional, and most definitely not an accidentally misusage of malconstruction based on an improper assumption of the words definition.   Incorrect is using 'insure'  to 'ensure someone of something,'  or the all too common incorrect use of irony,  all too common today,  but gay,  no it was intentional and not 'incorrect'.   Unless by incorrect you incorrectly meant to say "morally objectionable"  in which case,  I'll give you that,  although I could suggest some other words to use in its place in future subject along these lines.