Good analogy, Dr. When we've a media who has openly referenced a chill running up the leg, a President like a god (or God), a description of a presidential address as sermon-like (complete with reverential overtones), etc. it should be no surprise that there would be one openly advocating unconstitutional activity like legislating from the bench.
I don't think liberalism relies on ignoring the Constitution and legislating from the bench. I see it more as a goal to destroy the Constitution. And legislating from the bench is a means to that end. But what liberalism relies on is 1) ignorance of large numbers of the general population, 2) class envy and 3) a subservient media allowing history to be rewritten and the redefinition of accepted words, terms and concepts to go unchallenged.
Actually, Duck, Duck, Duck might be an excellent game for the children of today. If there is no goose, no one can ever be the "chosen" one. If no one is chosen, then no one need feel left out. Also, with no chosen one, there is no one to chase anyone, and possibly cause additional pain and injury to their precious psyches.
Ah, but I digress from your illustrative intent. It IS a good analogy...
