Conclusion
Under these most extraordinary of all circumstances, the effect of a failure to grant a stay could well be to deny Applicants fully effective relief or any relief in this case and to inflict material harm on the Presidential election process. A stay is further justified by the extraordinary importance of the outcome of this case and the extremely time-sensitive nature of relief. Applicants have been injured without relief for over ten years to the point of physical and emotional death; currently they are threatened with irreparable injury, and the equities clearly favor granting a stay, because a stay is the only means of protecting Susan Herbert, her minor sons Ethan and Christopher, all women and their children, enlisted service members and the integrity of the federal election process while ensuring women and the poor have proper and orderly access to the judicial system.
Respectfully submitted.
Susan Herbert, pro se
In Re Susan Herbert
Case #’s 07-9804 & 08-6622, pending
Exhibit List
A. Judgment/2008 Presidential election
B. Failure of solicitor general to respond to 08-6622; violation of
Marbury in 07-9804
C. Doubts regarding Obama’s birth; my birth certificate
D. $5.3 billion dollar price tag for purchasing the office of President
E. Obama on drafting women & reasoning the law for women and
children being above him
F. Is Barack Obama a constitutional law professor?
G. Obama inundating my mailbox even after given a cease and desist
order
H. Notice I sent Linda Griffin and Renneslear County Court
I. Open case in Duval County
J. Letter from Mel Martinez: Is this man for real or is he joking?
K. US case law regarding citizenship
L. In Re Susan Herbert 07-9084, the whole case sans appendices
M. In Re Susan Herbert 08-6622, the whole case with appendices
N. Second set of appendices to be attached to In Re Susan Herbert
08-6622
O. Declaration of Vote
