Uh, when you make ALL those exceptions, you are in agreement with a HUGE minority of the american people, not just the Bush administration.
Provide a citation from a credible source for both claims.
This is manifestly false - John McCain has recently denounced Hagee and rejected his support, and I regret to be the first to inform you that Falwell has been dead for over a year. The stuff you're dumping out here sounds like you got it from some way out of date leftwing attack blog.
Whether or not waterboarding could be considered "torture" is a debated issue, and provide a citation from a credible source for the claim about McCain's vote, and it's legislative context.
Provide a citation from a credible source.
What that means is that he's stopped looking like democrats, and of course Bush has SUPPORTED amnesty for illegal aliens, so you got that ass-backwards.
That's completely false - that is a quote from Dick Cheney.
That is false as well - prove otherwise - you can't.
,
No, "we" don't know that - how could you prove the negative that Saddam didn't have WMDs? You can't.
Where to begin. 
The "no diplomacy" thing has NOTHING to do with Iraq, but only IRAN, and then only while they continue on their path of setting the groundwork for acquiring nuclear weapons, and continue their sponsorship of terrorism all over the world, because there is NO POINT in "diplomacy" while those actions continue. Also "extricate" and "exit strategy" are loser appeaser DEMOCRAT ideas - McCain hasn't come up with a cut-and-run plan because he's not an appeaser - he wants to WIN.
Oh, all career politicians "stink"? Does Kennedy "stink"? Does pelosi "stink"? And Obama hasn't done anything on a national level - he's "fresh" the same way Hitler was "fresh" in 1933.
Yaaaaaaaa - in four years, goes from state senator of a chicago ghetto district to running for president - no ambition there. 
There you go again - the Obama cliches that mean nothing, but sound good to Obamabots. What do you mean, exactly, by "transparency"? What "transparency" would he add - exactly?
Like what? Citation?
Yeah - you read moveon.org, so you got it all figured out.
"Change" for what?? "Hope" for what??
No, he's just repeating his "change" mantra, so all you Obamabots think he's talking to each of you and the change you want -reeeeeeeal clever strategy.
Tell us all about the "implications". 
I've listened to him, and I'm not inspired, I'm bored. All I hear is meaningless cliches.
Not needed in a president.
Racism and ageism. Your credibility just went to zero.
With any luck of the american people, you'll never get to that bridge.
The point of my comments blew past you at Mach 3. Listen now: the comments about McCain's health by his physician, the person in a position to know, is that (1) he's cancer-free, and (2) that he is physiologically younger than his chronological age. Another physician who has never examined him, nor seen his tests, erroneously said he's not cancer-free, based only on gross statistics regarding recurrence in the population in general.
What you need to be sorry for is that you created a post full of false statements, unsupported claims, misattribution of a quote, logical errors, inuenndo, racism, and ageism.
