Reply to thread

My uncle has written a few books on fundamental christian apologetics, that I've read for no reason other than to know thy family.  What I've noticed is that they tend to take a certain set of assumptions as a priori-fact and derive understanding based on those facts. 


So in that sense if you take for granted some fundamental axioms then apologetics based on those facts are useful.  If they start at a level above what you take for granted they are 100% useless.  For most scientists apologetics start above the level you can intelligently take for granted, making them useless.


Back
Top