Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
I am not quite sure where exactly you get off stating that "Fox didn't deem it worthy of an investigation or mention." 1) Do you have any evidence of basis that this letter was not investigated in any manner?2) Would you prefer that a news station discuss every letter they receive on the air regardless of whether they can confirm it or not? Further, where exactly is your evidence that they "sat on evidence of the affair"? A letter written to a news anchor is not "evidence" and never will be. You claim (with no proof) that Fox sat on the evidence and refused to report the story. You further argue that a letter written to a news anchor should merit the trashing of US Senator without any additional evidence. That is the type of "news" that you seek? Further, why have I not seen you commenting on John Edwards marital problems and demanding for more coverage of that?
I am not quite sure where exactly you get off stating that "Fox didn't deem it worthy of an investigation or mention."
1) Do you have any evidence of basis that this letter was not investigated in any manner?
2) Would you prefer that a news station discuss every letter they receive on the air regardless of whether they can confirm it or not?
Further, where exactly is your evidence that they "sat on evidence of the affair"? A letter written to a news anchor is not "evidence" and never will be.
You claim (with no proof) that Fox sat on the evidence and refused to report the story. You further argue that a letter written to a news anchor should merit the trashing of US Senator without any additional evidence. That is the type of "news" that you seek?
Further, why have I not seen you commenting on John Edwards marital problems and demanding for more coverage of that?
