Former Obama donor and Epstein defense attorney was the biased judge who signed off on the unjust Mar-a-Lago raid

[mark francis]

The left cannot hide their close associations with radical Trump and conservative-hating democrats, many of whom are guilty of criminal offenses against their political opponents.


Judge who approved FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago once linked to Jeffrey Epstein | New York Post

Judge who OK’d Mar-a-Lago raid Obama donor once linked to Jeffrey Epstein

Published Aug. 9, 2022

Updated Aug. 9, 2022, 3:41 p.m. ET


The Florida federal magistrate judge who signed off on a search warrant authorizing the FBI raid of former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort donated to Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign — months after he left the local US Attorney’s office to rep employees of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein who had received immunity in the long-running sex-trafficking investigation of the financier.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

There was EVERY REASON to raid Shitshizpant's mansion to retrieve the documents he stole.

 

[mark francis]

There was EVERY REASON to raid Shitshizpant's mansion to retrieve the documents he stole.

AI Summary

To evaluate whether the Mar-a-Lago raid was justified, consider the following points:

1. The raid was part of an investigation into the handling of classified documents.

The raid differed from raids that did not happen on Biden and others because Trump is a republican and the raid was a political witch hunt.
2. Legal authorities obtained a warrant, indicating probable cause.

The democrats got a tainted warrant from a judge who had been a big Obama donor and Jeffrey Epstein defense attorney who hated Trump and wanted to bring him down before the 2024 election.

1. The investigation aimed to uphold national security and legal standards.

Democrats made that claim knowing they would never be able to prove their raid had any legitimate national security purpose whatsoever.

1. Critics argue it was politically motivated, raising concerns about bias.

Just like Letitia James and Eric Swalwell claim they should not have to answer for their mortgage fraud because the investigators are working for a republican administration, democrats would also be wrong to dig for dirt on Trump using democrat investigators.

1. Supporters believe it was necessary to enforce the law equally.

Then raid Biden's home and seize items from his wife's drawers like they did in Trump's house.

1. The outcome of the investigation may influence public opinion and future legal precedents.

Exactly. Letitia James promised to find dirt on Trump to prosecute him for and she dug up old data from decades old banking transactions, changing laws on statue of limitations, and politically tried Trump over mortgage fraud allegations that higher courts later overturned. Likewise, the precedent is now set for Trump's AG to file charges against a long line of democrats for mortgage fraud. What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Trump is a rapey old child molester, a convicted criminal and fraudster. His sorry ass belongs in prison.

 

[mark francis]

Trump is a rapey old child molester, a convicted criminal and fraudster. His sorry ass belongs in prison.

Making false allegations against Trump in an effort to cover up the large number of sexually deviant democrats is wicked.

 

[Gabriel_Bell]

Shitshizpants is wicked, plus, he stinks.

 

[mark francis]

Shitshizpants is wicked, plus, he stinks.

At least he didn't shower with his young daughter, swim naked in front of female secret service agents, and rape vulnerable women in the halls of Congress.