Frump files for divorce from NATO over Ukraine

[Stalin]

The new US National Security Strategy signals a massive foreign policy shift; it remains to be seen if Washington is serious about it

By Larry Johnson, political analyst and commentator, former CIA analyst and member of the US State Department’s Office for Counterterrorism

Here are the major rhetorical shifts in strategy compared to the previous strategies released during the respective presidencies of Trump (2017) and Biden (2022):

• From global cop to regional hegemon: Unlike Biden’s 2022 NSS (which emphasized alliances and great-power competition) or Trump’s 2017 version (which named China and Russia as revisionists), this document ends America’s “forever burdens” abroad. It prioritizes the Americas over Eurasia, framing Europe and the Middle East as deprioritized theaters.
• Ideological retreat: Democracy promotion is explicitly abandoned – “we seek peaceful commercial relations without imposing democratic change” (tell that to the Venezuelans). Authoritarians are not judged, and the EU is called “anti-democratic.”
• Confrontational ally relations: Europe faces scathing criticism for migration, free speech curbs, and risks of “civilizational erasure” (e.g., demographic shifts making nations “unrecognizable in 20 years”). The US vows to support the “patriotic” European parties resisting this, drawing Kremlin-like rhetoric accusations from EU leaders.
• China policy: Acknowledges failed engagement; seeks “mutually advantageous” ties but with deterrence (e.g., Taiwan as a priority). No full decoupling, but restrictions on tech/dependencies.
• Multipolar acceptance: Invites regional powers to manage their spheres (e.g., Japan in East Asia, Arab-Israeli bloc in the Gulf), signaling US restraint to avoid direct confrontations.

The NSS represents a seismic shift in America’s approach to NATO, emphasizing “burden-shifting” over unconditional alliance leadership. It frames NATO not as a values-based community but as a transactional partnership in which US commitments – troops, funding, and nuclear guarantees – are tied to European allies meeting steep new demands. This America First recalibration prioritizes US resources for the Indo-Pacific and Western Hemisphere, de-escalating in Europe to avoid “forever burdens.” Key changes include halting NATO expansion, demanding 5% GDP defense spending by 2035, and restoring “strategic stability” with Russia via a Ukraine ceasefire. While the US reaffirms Article 5 and its nuclear umbrella, it signals potential partial withdrawals by 2027 if Europe fails to step up, risking alliance cohesion amid demographic and ideological critiques of Europe. When Russia completes the defeat of Ukraine, the continued existence of NATO will be a genuine concern.

from the censored https://www.******/news/629112-us-national-security-strategy/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Email

the document : https://nz.news.yahoo.com/read-white-house-national-security-142212235.html

National Security Strategy Archive - National Security Strategy Archive

The National Security Strategy Report is published by the executive branch of the United States government. It is intended to be a comprehensive statement

nssarchive.us

Trump’s new national security strategy: 5 key takeaways

President Trump released his national security strategy late Thursday night with a focus on building up a larger military presence in the Western Hemisphere, balancing global trade, tightening up border security, and winning the culture war with Europe. The sweeping strategy is typically...

nz.news.yahoo.com

read it..the usual lies and distortions...its a essay on non-ironic exceptionalism

comrade stalin
moscow

 

[Phoenix68]

Frump files for divorce from NATO over Ukraine​

.

.
"RUN, YOU FUCKIN' CHICKENHAWK-PUSSY, RUUUUNNNN!!!!"
.​

 

[mark francis]

The new US National Security Strategy signals a massive foreign policy shift; it remains to be seen if Washington is serious about it

By Larry Johnson, political analyst and commentator, former CIA analyst and member of the US State Department’s Office for Counterterrorism

Here are the major rhetorical shifts in strategy compared to the previous strategies released during the respective presidencies of Trump (2017) and Biden (2022):

• From global cop to regional hegemon: Unlike Biden’s 2022 NSS (which emphasized alliances and great-power competition) or Trump’s 2017 version (which named China and Russia as revisionists), this document ends America’s “forever burdens” abroad. It prioritizes the Americas over Eurasia, framing Europe and the Middle East as deprioritized theaters.
• Ideological retreat: Democracy promotion is explicitly abandoned – “we seek peaceful commercial relations without imposing democratic change” (tell that to the Venezuelans). Authoritarians are not judged, and the EU is called “anti-democratic.”
• Confrontational ally relations: Europe faces scathing criticism for migration, free speech curbs, and risks of “civilizational erasure” (e.g., demographic shifts making nations “unrecognizable in 20 years”). The US vows to support the “patriotic” European parties resisting this, drawing Kremlin-like rhetoric accusations from EU leaders.
• China policy: Acknowledges failed engagement; seeks “mutually advantageous” ties but with deterrence (e.g., Taiwan as a priority). No full decoupling, but restrictions on tech/dependencies.
• Multipolar acceptance: Invites regional powers to manage their spheres (e.g., Japan in East Asia, Arab-Israeli bloc in the Gulf), signaling US restraint to avoid direct confrontations.

The NSS represents a seismic shift in America’s approach to NATO, emphasizing “burden-shifting” over unconditional alliance leadership. It frames NATO not as a values-based community but as a transactional partnership in which US commitments – troops, funding, and nuclear guarantees – are tied to European allies meeting steep new demands. This America First recalibration prioritizes US resources for the Indo-Pacific and Western Hemisphere, de-escalating in Europe to avoid “forever burdens.” Key changes include halting NATO expansion, demanding 5% GDP defense spending by 2035, and restoring “strategic stability” with Russia via a Ukraine ceasefire. While the US reaffirms Article 5 and its nuclear umbrella, it signals potential partial withdrawals by 2027 if Europe fails to step up, risking alliance cohesion amid demographic and ideological critiques of Europe. When Russia completes the defeat of Ukraine, the continued existence of NATO will be a genuine concern.

from the censored https://www.******/news/629112-us-national-security-strategy/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Email

the document : https://nz.news.yahoo.com/read-white-house-national-security-142212235.html

National Security Strategy Archive - National Security Strategy Archive

The National Security Strategy Report is published by the executive branch of the United States government. It is intended to be a comprehensive statement

nssarchive.us

Trump’s new national security strategy: 5 key takeaways

President Trump released his national security strategy late Thursday night with a focus on building up a larger military presence in the Western Hemisphere, balancing global trade, tightening up border security, and winning the culture war with Europe. The sweeping strategy is typically...

nz.news.yahoo.com

read it..the usual lies and distortions...its a essay on non-ironic exceptionalism

comrade stalin
moscow

Not even Schiff and his fake whistleblower insurrectionists are able to thwart Trump's diplomacy today.

 

[Phoenix68]

Not even Schiff and his fake whistleblower insurrectionists are able to thwart Trump's diplomacy today.

.
....AND, IT SHOWS!!!!!
.​

"It’s a mark of the president’s unyielding belief in his inner circle made up of old friends, family and confidants, and underscores his deep distrust of the broader national security and State Department apparatus that has served as the backbone of foreign relations for decades."

.
aka PARANOIA
.​

 

[mark francis]

.
....AND, IT SHOWS!!!!!
.​

"It’s a mark of the president’s unyielding belief in his inner circle made up of old friends, family and confidants, and underscores his deep distrust of the broader national security and State Department apparatus that has served as the backbone of foreign relations for decades."

.
aka PARANOIA
.​

Demmies not only hate Trump and his supporters but also hate his whole family.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

The new US National Security Strategy signals a massive foreign policy shift; it remains to be seen if Washington is serious about it

By Larry Johnson, political analyst and commentator, former CIA analyst and member of the US State Department’s Office for Counterterrorism

Here are the major rhetorical shifts in strategy compared to the previous strategies released during the respective presidencies of Trump (2017) and Biden (2022):

• From global cop to regional hegemon: Unlike Biden’s 2022 NSS (which emphasized alliances and great-power competition) or Trump’s 2017 version (which named China and Russia as revisionists), this document ends America’s “forever burdens” abroad. It prioritizes the Americas over Eurasia, framing Europe and the Middle East as deprioritized theaters.
• Ideological retreat: Democracy promotion is explicitly abandoned – “we seek peaceful commercial relations without imposing democratic change” (tell that to the Venezuelans). Authoritarians are not judged, and the EU is called “anti-democratic.”
• Confrontational ally relations: Europe faces scathing criticism for migration, free speech curbs, and risks of “civilizational erasure” (e.g., demographic shifts making nations “unrecognizable in 20 years”). The US vows to support the “patriotic” European parties resisting this, drawing Kremlin-like rhetoric accusations from EU leaders.
• China policy: Acknowledges failed engagement; seeks “mutually advantageous” ties but with deterrence (e.g., Taiwan as a priority). No full decoupling, but restrictions on tech/dependencies.
• Multipolar acceptance: Invites regional powers to manage their spheres (e.g., Japan in East Asia, Arab-Israeli bloc in the Gulf), signaling US restraint to avoid direct confrontations.

The NSS represents a seismic shift in America’s approach to NATO, emphasizing “burden-shifting” over unconditional alliance leadership. It frames NATO not as a values-based community but as a transactional partnership in which US commitments – troops, funding, and nuclear guarantees – are tied to European allies meeting steep new demands. This America First recalibration prioritizes US resources for the Indo-Pacific and Western Hemisphere, de-escalating in Europe to avoid “forever burdens.” Key changes include halting NATO expansion, demanding 5% GDP defense spending by 2035, and restoring “strategic stability” with Russia via a Ukraine ceasefire. While the US reaffirms Article 5 and its nuclear umbrella, it signals potential partial withdrawals by 2027 if Europe fails to step up, risking alliance cohesion amid demographic and ideological critiques of Europe. When Russia completes the defeat of Ukraine, the continued existence of NATO will be a genuine concern.

from the censored https://www.******/news/629112-us-national-security-strategy/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=Email

the document : https://nz.news.yahoo.com/read-white-house-national-security-142212235.html

National Security Strategy Archive - National Security Strategy Archive

The National Security Strategy Report is published by the executive branch of the United States government. It is intended to be a comprehensive statement

nssarchive.us

Trump’s new national security strategy: 5 key takeaways

President Trump released his national security strategy late Thursday night with a focus on building up a larger military presence in the Western Hemisphere, balancing global trade, tightening up border security, and winning the culture war with Europe. The sweeping strategy is typically...

nz.news.yahoo.com

read it..the usual lies and distortions...its a essay on non-ironic exceptionalism

comrade stalin
moscow

Defund the World's Policeman

The Cold War needs to be put in deep-freeze. Consider the Chickenhawk traitors who benefited from it and want to keep it going.

We should not defend Taiwan; the Chiang-Kai Shreks never defended our troops over there. The Pacific Rim is in China's Sphere of Influence. What would we think if China had army and navy bases all over the Caribbean?

NYETO parasites should take care of their own defense. We owe them nothing.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

.
View attachment 26976
.
"RUN, YOU FUCKIN' CHICKENHAWK-PUSSY, RUUUUNNNN!!!!"
.​

Talking Down Sagacity

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

.
....AND, IT SHOWS!!!!!
.​

"It’s a mark of the president’s unyielding belief in his inner circle made up of old friends, family and confidants, and underscores his deep distrust of the broader national security and State Department apparatus that has served as the backbone of foreign relations for decades."

.
aka PARANOIA
.​

Warmongering Mongrels

The State Department's backbone has had spina bifida since its birth. As long as the ruling class's sons didn't have to pay with their lives for its mistakes, it wouldn't change. It still doesn't recognize the hundred-year-old Jihad.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Demmies not only hate Trump and his supporters but also hate his whole family.

Unmanly Fathers Sire Lesbians

Except for his nasty dyke niece.

 

[mark francis]

Unmanly Fathers Sire Lesbians

Except for his nasty dyke niece.

Have any transvestites who were born with male genitalia among relatives of democrats ever gotten pregnant?