Reply to thread

Granting the government the general power to control property but having that gov provide some paper guarantee that one or two property rights will be protected is not really what is meant by protecting property rights. That is not really protecting property rights - that is lip service.

 

I good example of protecting property rights would be to start with the assumptions that every single thing a man works for is his first and foremost and that it can only be taken away for a just cause with due process and for a compelling reason.


Back
Top