Reply to thread

Maybe you could change the title to straw man or topic change. It is clear by now, however, that as I suspected, there isn't much to say regarding the global mean claimed by climate science because the margin of error is multiple times larger than the claims of accuracy to a tenth of a degree.

 

You didn't really expect anything like actual debate on the topic did you?

 

One interesting tidbit did come out of it when lagboltz said that he believed the deliberate reduction of past temperatures in order to make present temperatures appear warmer was climate science's way of making the data "clearer" and improving the accuracy of the surface temperature database.

 

I have shown lots of people those examples of data tampering and have heard lots of excuses and apologies for them but he is the first to ever claim that the reason past temperatures have been lowered is to make the database more accurate.


Back
Top