Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
No, I'm not. I see that you beleive that bit of nonsense as well. Are you aware that the author of that bit of idiocy asked about sketics on warmist blogs and built his paper based on that feedback? He didn't post his survey at a single skeptical site. He claimed to have tried to get it posted on multiple skeptical sites although no skeptical blog administrator could be found who was approached and when asked which skeptical blogs turned him down, he refused to answer. Every aspect of the man made climate change business is rife with fraud and data manipulation. If any actual evidence existed in support of the claims that man is responsible for the changing climate, don't you think it would be posted all over the internet. Perhaps you could provide a bit of hard, observable, repeatable evidence that confirms the claim that a trace gas with no capacity to absorb and retain energy within an open atmosphere can cause global warming. I am just a guy who grasps the science and can see the foundational problems with the hypothesis of anthropogenic climate change. The scientific underpinnings of the field are so terribly flawed, that if there weren't such huge political and financial benefits to admiring the emperor's new clothes, the whole pseudoscientific trash heap would be sitting on the same shelf as phrenology.
No, I'm not. I see that you beleive that bit of nonsense as well. Are you aware that the author of that bit of idiocy asked about sketics on warmist blogs and built his paper based on that feedback? He didn't post his survey at a single skeptical site. He claimed to have tried to get it posted on multiple skeptical sites although no skeptical blog administrator could be found who was approached and when asked which skeptical blogs turned him down, he refused to answer. Every aspect of the man made climate change business is rife with fraud and data manipulation. If any actual evidence existed in support of the claims that man is responsible for the changing climate, don't you think it would be posted all over the internet.
Perhaps you could provide a bit of hard, observable, repeatable evidence that confirms the claim that a trace gas with no capacity to absorb and retain energy within an open atmosphere can cause global warming.
I am just a guy who grasps the science and can see the foundational problems with the hypothesis of anthropogenic climate change. The scientific underpinnings of the field are so terribly flawed, that if there weren't such huge political and financial benefits to admiring the emperor's new clothes, the whole pseudoscientific trash heap would be sitting on the same shelf as phrenology.
