Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Normal
I'm sorry but the pertinent question has been on thermodynamic equilibrium since post 66. We are now on post 85. How can we possibly discuss thermodynamics of any kind when you can't even understand the most fundamental principle of radiative equilibrium. You continually were not able to tell the difference between power in watts and the power density in watts per square inch. You continually could not distinguish between the properties of coherent radiation and incoherent radiation. These topics are very pertinent to the discussion and should be very simple for anyone slightly adept in science. So you chuckle off the work of top physicists of the last century simply because they got a Nobel prizes in physics and you compare them to the Nobel peace prize? That is simply juvenile. If you are adept in science like you claim you are, I certainly don't see it in your posts. This discussion with you is like an argument with a sullen 7 year old that has an attention deficit disorder when he is not blocking his ears. Don't forget to do the light bulb experiment where there would be a black column between the bulbs due to canceled radiation if your theory is correct. Again, show me some references to support your claim that that radiation cancels between objects in thermal equilibrium, and that no photons are exchanged between such bodies. You can't continue an argument in physics until you do that.
I'm sorry but the pertinent question has been on thermodynamic equilibrium since post 66. We are now on post 85.
How can we possibly discuss thermodynamics of any kind when you can't even understand the most fundamental principle of radiative equilibrium. You continually were not able to tell the difference between power in watts and the power density in watts per square inch. You continually could not distinguish between the properties of coherent radiation and incoherent radiation. These topics are very pertinent to the discussion and should be very simple for anyone slightly adept in science.
So you chuckle off the work of top physicists of the last century simply because they got a Nobel prizes in physics and you compare them to the Nobel peace prize? That is simply juvenile. If you are adept in science like you claim you are, I certainly don't see it in your posts. This discussion with you is like an argument with a sullen 7 year old that has an attention deficit disorder when he is not blocking his ears.
Don't forget to do the light bulb experiment where there would be a black column between the bulbs due to canceled radiation if your theory is correct.
Again, show me some references to support your claim that that radiation cancels between objects in thermal equilibrium, and that no photons are exchanged between such bodies. You can't continue an argument in physics until you do that.
