Now it seems you don't understand what empirical evidence means. You also don't understand the major constraints of the second law. Entropy only has meaning in a closed system. Even if the system is the solar system.
"Most of the infrared light coming to us from the Universe is absorbed by water vapor and carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere. Only in a few narrow wavelength ranges, can infrared light make it through (at least partially) to a ground based infrared telescope."
http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/cosmic_classroom/ir_tutorial/irwindows.html
There you go, stuck in the ancient 1899 definition of thermodynamics again. Even then you got it wrong. It is HEAT energy that will not flow from a cooler to a warmer body. Photons are not heat energy, but I forgot you don't believe in photons either. Or maybe you believe they have magical powers.
That is your irrationality that I was demonstrating. I'm glad you agree it is irrationality. Of course a falling icicle is not radiation. The point is bigger than just radiation, it is about all of thermodynamics. If you don't understand thermodynamics, nobody can't expect you to understand radiative thermodynamics.
So you still believe in a dark band between light bulbs of similar wattage. You reject the concept of empirical evidence. You embrace science of 1899. You disagree with experts on astronomy. To me these writings seem like the work of a Troll. Either that, or the information is coming from "Beginning Science for Little Tots".
