Again a failure on your part. If one bulb is warmer, the other simply will not radiate along the vectors where the sum is zero.
I am dismissing your imaginary evidence insofar as you believe it proves backradiation.
I know that you wish that energy was not included in the second law, but alas, I am afraid that it is. Photons are energy and they won't move from a low energy source to a high energy source either. Everywhere you look in reference to the second law, energy is the topic.
"Second Law of Thermodynamics - Increased Entropy
The Second Law of Thermodynamics is commonly known as the Law of Increased Entropy. While quantity remains the same (First Law), the quality of matter/energy deteriorates gradually over time. How so? Usable energy is inevitably used for productivity, growth and repair. In the process, usable energy is converted into unusable energy. Thus, usable energy is irretrievably lost in the form of unusable energy.
I see you also copied that from the same professors notes. I find no inaccuracy there.
Ahhhhhhh. So there is no CO2, or other greenhouse gasses present at the altitues where IR telescopes are located. Tell me, at what altitude do the so called greenhouse gasses cut off?
Did you note the posting by dogtowner on the fact that there has been no warming for the past 16 years even though the amount of atmospheric CO2 has steadily increased?
What would falsify the greenhouse hypothesis for you?
