Reply to thread

Yeah, I expected this kind of bluster. I assumed you would ignore the fact that current explanations from sources such as NASA continue to employ the greenhouse effect, clear evidence that papers such as the one you linked to have made no impression on real science.


Wow. You have undergraduate degrees in science. How impressive. That sure makes you an expert on any scientific subject under the sun. Funny how despite those undergraduate degrees in science you presented an experiment regarding the greenhouse effect that only displayed your utter ignorance in the subject. 


So you'll forgive me if I have trouble trusting your [sarcasm]dispassionate, non-biased, objective and informed[/sarcasm] review of a single paper circulating amongst the far-right fever swamps.


As I said before, NASA? Or Palerider? Easy choice.


Back
Top