There are billions upon billions of dollars available in grant money available to anyone who is willing to jump on the AGW train. There are jeers from the "consensus" and literal threats to do damage to the career of those who buck the trend.
There is a reason that you can't find any papers from the field of physics promoting the greenhouse effect. And don't suppose that because nasa says a thing, that it must be true. We just learned that nasa can't even get basic temperature measurements right. That being the case, how do you justify trusting them on the big items?
So exactly which post graduate degrees in science do you have? Or for that matter, which undergraduate degrees in hard science do you have? Attacking me does nothing to disprove the information that I have provided that puts the lie to the greenhouse theory. So far, nothing you have said has diminished its value in any way.
Nothing to forgive. Parrotts don't really know what they are saying, so the blame for what they say lies with those who taught them the words.
I can take an accurate set of temperatures. I have been doing it daily at the lab for years. Since nasa has demonstrated that they can't, your trust might just be misplaced.
And still, the paper I provided remains unrebutted. Since you are unable to even raise any valid questions with regard to its contents, nothing you have said so far has any meaning at all. The information still stands.
