Reply to thread

Well, of course you do.  Even when, I suppose, that "research money" is used in the form of very expensive and expansive media campaigns.  Have you never seen the AGW commmercials on TV in which some movie star tells us how we are causing global warming and at the end, you see on the screen which taxpayer funded department, or agency is sponsoring the campaign.  You really are naive.




[/quote=from your link]Morano's source for the $50 billion number, meanwhile, is Australian "skeptic" Robert Carter. The article that Morano cites in which Carter asserts that $50 billion has been spent "on research into global warming since 1990" offers no documentation to support the claim.


Your guy claims that there was no documentation and that the source was from ausrtalia.  The article says:


Reporter Eve Conant, who interviewed Senator James Inhofe (R-Okla.), the Ranking Member of the Environment & Public Works Committee, was given all the latest data proving conclusively that it is the proponents of man-made global warming fears that enjoy a monumental funding advantage over the skeptics. 

[/QUOTE]

Back
Top