Being free of charge doesn't make it relevant, now, does it?
LMAO.
Is there any logical proof that is not phrased as an argument?????
If I need to explain simple concepts like 'proof' and 'arguments' to you, that is an experience worse than constipation.
But the proof is there. You need only google 'ontology' and you would have all the proof required for the soul.
If it were defined that way, then the definition is WRONG. Ontology is NOT a science -- it is a philosophy. There is no educational institution that I know of that represents it as ontological sciences.
Duh?
Of course you did.
You argued that homosexuality is also a manifestation of love, have you not?
And if it is so, then it is covered by god's commandment of love, is that not how your absurd argument goes?
Therefore, introducing fecal matter to one's (and partner's) blood stream, hence seriously undermining both their immune systems is the logical and most probable consequence of the commandment of love. Do you follow?
Hence -- love up someone's a$$.
Haven't I already said that I base my opinions on facts and logic?
And have I not presented only facts and logic as far as the catholic teaching is concerned?
I have utterly no interest in your sex life to justify lying about it in the public domain.
Duh?
How about a masochist, hmmm? Does the commandment of love apply to a masochist -- to love others as themselves?
Clearly, that, in itself, is WRONG. Clearly, the imperative of christian love operates WITHIN the parameters of the natural law god prescribes for man.
