Discuss politics - join our community by registering for free here! HOP - the political discussion forum

Reply to thread

Message

Well mostly I just jumped in this because of the 2 great commandments and what they meant. I was not wanting to get into a conversation on homosexual marriage, besides you already know where I stand when it comes to marriage.

I think plural marriage should be legal because some groups truly think they will not make it to heaven if they do not have plural marriage.

But in general I am against government marriage. I do not think the government should be in the job of "validating relationships" I would like to go back to the old days when a couple wrote in their bible on the day they were married and their pastor signed the bible and one parent on each side signed the bible and they were married, no government involved.

so for the sake of argument in today's times I think government marriage should be for the following...

anyone or anything can marry any one or any thing at any time for any reason in groups or in singles for any reason.

that would cover any possible argument

<blockquote data-quote="Pandora" data-source="post: 106800" data-attributes="member: 1040">Well mostly I just jumped in this because of the 2 great commandments and what they meant.&nbsp; I was not wanting to get into a conversation on homosexual marriage, besides you already know where I stand when it comes to marriage.I think plural marriage should be legal because some groups truly think they will not make it to heaven if they do not have plural marriage.&nbsp; But in general I am against government marriage.&nbsp; I do not think the government should be in the job of &quot;validating relationships&quot; I would like to go back to the old days when a couple wrote in their bible on the day they were married and their pastor signed the bible and one parent on each side signed the bible and they were married, no government involved.so for the sake of argument in today&#039;s times I think government marriage should be for the following...anyone or anything can marry any one or any thing at any time for any reason in groups or in singles for any reason.that would cover any possible argument&nbsp; <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Pandora, post: 106800, member: 1040"] Well mostly I just jumped in this because of the 2 great commandments and what they meant. I was not wanting to get into a conversation on homosexual marriage, besides you already know where I stand when it comes to marriage. I think plural marriage should be legal because some groups truly think they will not make it to heaven if they do not have plural marriage. But in general I am against government marriage. I do not think the government should be in the job of "validating relationships" I would like to go back to the old days when a couple wrote in their bible on the day they were married and their pastor signed the bible and one parent on each side signed the bible and they were married, no government involved. so for the sake of argument in today's times I think government marriage should be for the following... anyone or anything can marry any one or any thing at any time for any reason in groups or in singles for any reason. that would cover any possible argument :) [/QUOTE]

Verification