What part of 'proof' don't you understand, hmmm?
Oh, and why in heaven's name should one review mare to see proof of man-made religious dogma?
Your opinions have taken a radical turn south, I think.
That is what ideology often does -- and not necessarily a religious ideology.
Neither does one have to belittle their beliefs -- as you have.
I don't need to have esp to have a firm grasp of human nature and its logical purpose.
Please peddle your nonsense someplace else.
I simply have no intentions of suffering either your or mare's nonsense -- nor the cheek of a self-proclaimed agnostic who do not even have the sense to look up what agnosticism is.
Of course that is some sort of character flaw on my part -- as dr who succintly pointed out.
No one is stopping them.
I have the ability to comprehend lots of things -- including your pretend-agnosticism.
Of course. It is intuitive. Something that is purely invented wouldn't appeal to human comprehension intuitively, would it?
